Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK.
Anticancer Res. 2012 Jul;32(7):2399-406.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Sequential treatment with targeted agents is standard of care for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, clinical data directly comparing treatment outcomes with a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor or a vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agent in the second-line setting are lacking. We evaluated sequential treatment in a syngeneic, orthotopic mouse model of mRCC.
BALB/c mice were orthotopically implanted with murine RCC (RENCA) cells expressing luciferase and randomized to vehicle, sunitinib, sunitinib followed by sorafenib, or sunitinib followed by everolimus. Tumor growth and metastases were assessed by in vivo (whole body) and ex vivo (primary tumor, lung, liver) luciferase activity and necropsies, performed on day 20 or 46 for vehicle and treatment groups, respectively.
Sunitinib followed by everolimus was associated with reduced luciferase activity and primary tumor weight and volume compared with sunitinib, and sunitinib followed by sorafenib.
Sequential therapy with sunitinib followed by everolimus demonstrated significant antitumor and anti-metastatic effects.
背景/目的:对于转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者,靶向药物序贯治疗是标准治疗方案。然而,二线治疗中直接比较哺乳动物雷帕霉素抑制剂或血管内皮生长因子靶向药物治疗结局的临床数据尚缺乏。我们在 mRCC 的同基因原位小鼠模型中评估了序贯治疗。
BALB/c 小鼠原位植入表达荧光素酶的小鼠肾细胞癌(RENCA)细胞,并随机分为对照组、舒尼替尼组、舒尼替尼后继以索拉非尼组或舒尼替尼后继以依维莫司组。通过体内(全身)和体外(原发肿瘤、肺、肝)荧光素酶活性和尸检评估肿瘤生长和转移情况,对照组和治疗组分别在第 20 天和第 46 天进行。
与舒尼替尼相比,舒尼替尼后继以依维莫司治疗组的荧光素酶活性和原发肿瘤重量及体积均降低,且舒尼替尼后继以索拉非尼组也是如此。
舒尼替尼后继以依维莫司的序贯治疗显示出显著的抗肿瘤和抗转移作用。