HSS J. 2011 Jul;7(2):108-14. doi: 10.1007/s11420-010-9187-7. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
Thermal capsular shrinkage was popular for the treatment of shoulder instability, despite a paucity of outcomes data in the literature defining the indications for this procedure or supporting its long-term efficacy. The purpose of this study was to perform a clinical evaluation of radiofrequency thermal capsular shrinkage for the treatment of shoulder instability, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. From 1999 to 2001, 101 consecutive patients with mild to moderate shoulder instability underwent shoulder stabilization surgery with thermal capsular shrinkage using a monopolar radiofrequency device. Follow-up included a subjective outcome questionnaire, discussion of pain, instability, and activity level. Mean follow-up was 3.3 years (range 2.0-4.7 years). The thermal capsular shrinkage procedure failed due to instability and/or pain in 31% of shoulders at a mean time of 39 months. In patients with unidirectional anterior instability and those with concomitant labral repair, the procedure proved effective. Patients with multidirectional instability had moderate success. In contrast, four of five patients with isolated posterior instability failed. Thermal capsular shrinkage has been advocated for the treatment of shoulder instability, particularly mild to moderate capsular laxity. The ease of the procedure makes it attractive. However, our retrospective review revealed an overall failure rate of 31% in 80 patients with 2-year minimum follow-up. This mid- to long-term cohort study adds to the literature lacking support for thermal capsulorrhaphy in general, particularly posterior instability.
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11420-010-9187-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
尽管文献中缺乏关于该手术适应证的结果数据,也缺乏支持其长期疗效的确切证据,但热囊收缩术仍广泛用于治疗肩关节不稳定。本研究的目的是对使用单极射频设备行热囊收缩术治疗肩关节不稳定进行临床评估,随访时间至少为 2 年。1999 年至 2001 年间,101 例轻中度肩关节不稳定患者行肩关节稳定手术,术中采用热囊收缩术,使用单极射频设备。随访内容包括主观疗效问卷、疼痛、不稳定和活动水平讨论。平均随访时间为 3.3 年(2.0-4.7 年)。31%的患者(平均随访时间 39 个月)因不稳定和/或疼痛导致热囊收缩术失败。对于有单向前不稳定和伴有盂唇撕裂的患者,该手术效果良好。多向不稳定的患者效果中等。相反,5 例孤立性后不稳定患者中有 4 例失败。热囊收缩术被推荐用于治疗肩关节不稳定,特别是轻中度囊松弛。手术操作简单,因此很有吸引力。然而,我们的回顾性研究显示,在 80 例至少随访 2 年的患者中,总体失败率为 31%。这项中期至长期队列研究增加了文献中缺乏对热囊紧缩术的支持,特别是对后不稳定。
本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007/s11420-010-9187-7)包含补充材料,仅对授权用户开放。