• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Qualitative evaluation of a diabetes electronic decision support tool: views of users.糖尿病电子决策支持工具的定性评估:用户观点。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Jul 3;12:61. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-61.
2
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
3
Factors influencing implementation of a computerized, individualized, culturally tailored lupus decision aid in lupus clinics: a qualitative semi-structured interview study.影响狼疮诊所中使用计算机化、个体化、文化适应的狼疮决策辅助工具的因素:一项定性半结构式访谈研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Oct;38(10):2793-2801. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04643-w. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
4
The role of ICT in supporting disruptive innovation: a multi-site qualitative study of nurse practitioners in emergency departments.信息通信技术在支持颠覆性创新中的作用:对急诊部门护士从业者的多地点定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Apr 2;12:27. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-27.
5
Consultations between nurse prescribers and patients with diabetes in primary care: A qualitative study of patient views.初级保健中护士处方者与糖尿病患者之间的咨询:患者观点的定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Jan;48(1):37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Jul 11.
6
A qualitative study of primary care clinicians' views of treating childhood obesity.一项关于初级保健临床医生对儿童肥胖治疗看法的定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Sep 3;8:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-50.
7
Development of a prototype clinical decision support tool for osteoporosis disease management: a qualitative study of focus groups.开发用于骨质疏松症疾病管理的临床决策支持工具原型:焦点小组的定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Jul 22;10:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-40.
8
Perceptions and practices of general practitioners on providing oral health care to people with diabetes - a qualitative study.全科医生提供口腔保健服务给糖尿病患者的认知与实践 - 一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Feb 13;21(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-1102-9.
9
Reduction of inappropriate medication in older populations by electronic decision support (the PRIMA-eDS study): a qualitative study of practical implementation in primary care.通过电子决策支持减少老年人群不适当用药(PRIMA-eDS研究):一项关于基层医疗实际实施情况的定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 9;19(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0789-3.
10
Exploring the User Acceptability and Feasibility of a Clinical Decision Support Tool Designed to Facilitate Timely Diagnosis of New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes in Children: Qualitative Interview Study Among General Practitioners.探讨一款旨在帮助及时诊断儿童新发 1 型糖尿病的临床决策支持工具的用户接受度和可行性:全科医生定性访谈研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 23;8:e60411. doi: 10.2196/60411.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Utility, Impact, and Adoption Challenges of an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Prescription Advisory Tool for Type 2 Diabetes Management: Qualitative Study.评估用于2型糖尿病管理的人工智能处方咨询工具的效用、影响及采用挑战:定性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jun 13;11:e50939. doi: 10.2196/50939.
2
Stakeholder Perspectives regarding the Acceptability and Sustainability of a Multi-component Diabetes Care Strategy in South Asia: a longitudinal qualitative analysis.利益相关者对南亚多组分糖尿病护理策略的可接受性和可持续性的看法:一项纵向定性分析
Glob Implement Res Appl. 2022 Dec;2(4):350-360. doi: 10.1007/s43477-022-00060-5. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
3
Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Primary Care: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.临床决策支持系统在初级保健中的使用障碍和促进因素:混合方法系统评价。
Ann Fam Med. 2023 Jan-Feb;21(1):57-69. doi: 10.1370/afm.2908.
4
Workload and workflow implications associated with the use of electronic clinical decision support tools used by health professionals in general practice: a scoping review.工作负荷和工作流程对一般实践中医疗专业人员使用电子临床决策支持工具的影响:范围综述。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jan 20;24(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-01973-2.
5
Barriers and enablers to implementing and using clinical decision support systems for chronic diseases: a qualitative systematic review and meta-aggregation.实施和使用慢性病临床决策支持系统的障碍与促进因素:一项定性系统评价与元聚合分析
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Jul 28;3(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00326-x.
6
Using an Integrated Framework to Investigate the Facilitators and Barriers of Health Information Technology Implementation in Noncommunicable Disease Management: Systematic Review.利用综合框架研究非传染性疾病管理中健康信息技术实施的促进因素和障碍:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 20;24(7):e37338. doi: 10.2196/37338.
7
Integrating Option Grid Patient Decision Aids in the Epic Electronic Health Record: Case Study at 5 Health Systems.在 Epic 电子健康记录中整合选项网格患者决策辅助工具:5 个卫生系统的案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 3;23(5):e22766. doi: 10.2196/22766.
8
Mobile Clinical Decision Support System for the Management of Diabetic Patients With Kidney Complications in UK Primary Care Settings: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.英国基层医疗环境中用于管理患有肾脏并发症的糖尿病患者的移动临床决策支持系统:混合方法可行性研究
JMIR Diabetes. 2020 Nov 18;5(4):e19650. doi: 10.2196/19650.
9
Diabetes, Care Homes, and the Influence of Technology on Practice and Care Delivery in Care Homes: Systematic Review and Qualitative Synthesis.糖尿病、养老院以及技术对养老院实践与护理服务的影响:系统评价与定性综合分析
JMIR Diabetes. 2019 Apr 22;4(2):e11526. doi: 10.2196/11526.
10
Designing Colorectal Cancer Screening Decision Support: A Cognitive Engineering Enterprise.设计结直肠癌筛查决策支持:一项认知工程事业。
J Cogn Eng Decis Mak. 2016 Mar;10(1):74-90. doi: 10.1177/1555343416630875.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of physicians' accuracy in recording with quality of care in cardiovascular medicine.心血管医学中医生记录准确性与医疗质量的关联。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009 Dec;16(6):722-8. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3283317c3f.
2
Individualized electronic decision support and reminders to improve diabetes care in the community: COMPETE II randomized trial.个体化电子决策支持与提醒以改善社区糖尿病护理:COMPETE II随机试验
CMAJ. 2009 Jul 7;181(1-2):37-44. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081272.
3
Integrated electronic decision support increases cardiovascular disease risk assessment four fold in routine primary care practice.在常规基层医疗实践中,集成电子决策支持系统可使心血管疾病风险评估提高四倍。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008 Apr;15(2):173-8. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3282f13af4.
4
Glucose, lipid, and blood pressure control in Australian adults with type 2 diabetes: the 1999-2000 AusDiab.澳大利亚2型糖尿病成年人的血糖、血脂及血压控制:1999 - 2000年澳大利亚糖尿病、肥胖和生活方式研究(AusDiab)
Diabetes Care. 2005 Jun;28(6):1490-2. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.6.1490.
5
Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success.使用临床决策支持系统改善临床实践:对确定成功关键特征的试验进行系统评价。
BMJ. 2005 Apr 2;330(7494):765. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38398.500764.8F. Epub 2005 Mar 14.
6
Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.计算机化临床决策支持系统对从业者表现和患者结局的影响:一项系统综述。
JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223-38. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223.
7
Electronic decision support in general practice. What's the hold up?
Aust Fam Physician. 2003 Nov;32(11):941-4.
8
Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.基于计算机的临床决策支持系统对医生绩效和患者结局的影响:一项系统评价。
JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1339-46. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1339.
9
Diabetes care in general practice: meta-analysis of randomised control trials.全科医疗中的糖尿病护理:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
BMJ. 1998 Aug 8;317(7155):390-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7155.390.

糖尿病电子决策支持工具的定性评估:用户观点。

Qualitative evaluation of a diabetes electronic decision support tool: views of users.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Jul 3;12:61. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-61.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6947-12-61
PMID:22759239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3426492/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quality care of type 2 diabetes is complex and requires systematic use of clinical data to monitor care processes and outcomes. An electronic decision support (EDS) tool for the management of type 2 diabetes in primary care was developed by the Australian Pharmaceutical Alliance. The aim of this qualitative study was to evaluate the uptake and use of the EDS tool as well as to describe the impact of the EDS tool on the primary care consultation for diabetes from the perspectives of general practitioners and practice nurses.

METHODS

This was a qualitative study of telephone interviews. General Practitioners and Practice Nurses from four Divisions of General Practice who had used the EDS tool for a minimum of six weeks were invited to participate. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and the interview transcripts were coded and thematically analysed using NVivo 8 software.

RESULTS

In total 15 General Practitioners and 2 Practice Nurses completed the interviews. The most commonly used feature of the EDS tool was the summary side bar; its major function was to provide an overview of clinical information and a prompt or reminder to diabetes care. It also assisted communication and served an educational role as a visual aide in the consultation. Some participants thought the tool resulted in longer consultations. There were a range of barriers to use related to the design and functionality of the tool and to the primary care context.

CONCLUSIONS

The EDS tool shows promise as a way of summarising information about patients' diabetes state, reminder of required diabetes care and an aide to patient education.

摘要

背景

2 型糖尿病的高质量护理较为复杂,需要系统地使用临床数据来监测护理过程和结果。澳大利亚药品联盟开发了一种用于初级保健中 2 型糖尿病管理的电子决策支持(EDS)工具。本定性研究的目的是评估 EDS 工具的采用和使用情况,并从全科医生和执业护士的角度描述 EDS 工具对糖尿病初级保健咨询的影响。

方法

这是一项关于电话访谈的定性研究。邀请至少使用 EDS 工具六周的四个全科医生分部的全科医生和执业护士参加。对访谈记录进行半结构化访谈、编码和使用 NVivo 8 软件进行主题分析。

结果

共有 15 名全科医生和 2 名执业护士完成了访谈。EDS 工具最常使用的功能是摘要侧边栏;其主要功能是提供临床信息概述,并提示或提醒糖尿病护理。它还有助于沟通,并作为咨询中的视觉辅助工具发挥教育作用。一些参与者认为该工具导致咨询时间延长。在工具的设计和功能以及初级保健环境方面存在一系列使用障碍。

结论

EDS 工具有望成为一种总结患者糖尿病状况信息、提醒所需糖尿病护理以及辅助患者教育的方法。