Noh Yook-Hwan, Lim Hyeong-Seok, Jung Jin Ah, Jin Seok-Joon, Kim Mi Jo, Kim Yo Han, Park Hyun-Jung, Bae Kyun-Seop
Department of Clincal Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Aug;50(8):605-13. doi: 10.5414/CP201715.
To compare pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two formulations of metformin in healthy male volunteers under fasting conditions.
This was a randomized, 3-treatment, 6-sequence, 3-period, crossover study in healthy Korean volunteers. Subjects received a placebo or a single oral dose of reference formulation (500-mg metformin hydrochloride) or a test formulation (571-mg metformin acetate). The pharmacodynamic profile was assessed according to the blood glucose level.
A total of 30 healthy male volunteers were included, although 2 of them withdrew consent before drug administration. For the test formulation, the mean (SD) pharmacokinetic parameters of Cmax and AUC(0-24) were 1,691 (476.7) μg/ ml and 11,081 (2,804.5) mg×h/ml, respectively. For the reference formulation, the mean (SD) pharmacokinetic parameters of C(max) and AUC(0-24) were 1,749 (494.4) mg/ml and 11,814 (3,344.2) mg×h/ml, respectively. The 90% CIs for the test:reference ratio were 86.6 - 103.5 for logarithm-transformed AUClast and 87.9 - 107.4 for logarithm-transformed C(max), respectively. In pharmacodynamic analysis, the average blood glucose levels were obtained in the first 4 hours and 5 - 8 hours after drug administration. The 90% CIs for the test:reference ratio of the average blood glucose level were 96.5 - 101.8 for the intervals up to 4 hours during continued fasting and 99.3 - 106.8 for 5 - 8 hours after drug administration, respectively.
The data suggests that the test and reference formulations meet the regulatory criteria for the pharmacokinetic equivalence in fasting healthy Korean male volunteers. The pharmacodynamic profile was similar between the test and reference formulations. Both metformin formulations appeared to be generally well-tolerated.
比较两种二甲双胍制剂在空腹条件下于健康男性志愿者体内的药代动力学和药效学特征。
这是一项在健康韩国志愿者中开展的随机、三治疗组、六序列、三周期交叉研究。受试者接受安慰剂或单剂量口服参比制剂(500毫克盐酸二甲双胍)或受试制剂(571毫克醋酸二甲双胍)。根据血糖水平评估药效学特征。
共纳入30名健康男性志愿者,不过其中2人在给药前撤回了同意书。对于受试制剂,Cmax和AUC(0 - 24)的平均(标准差)药代动力学参数分别为1,691(476.7)微克/毫升和11,081(2,804.5)毫克·小时/毫升。对于参比制剂,C(max)和AUC(0 - 24)的平均(标准差)药代动力学参数分别为1,749(494.4)毫克/毫升和11,814(3,344.2)毫克·小时/毫升。受试制剂与参比制剂比值的90%置信区间,对数转换后的AUClast为86.6 - 103.5,对数转换后的C(max)为87.9 - 107.4。在药效学分析中,给药后前4小时和5 - 8小时获取平均血糖水平。受试制剂与参比制剂平均血糖水平比值的90%置信区间,持续禁食期间至4小时的区间为96.5 - 101.8,给药后5 - 8小时为99.3 - 106.8。
数据表明,受试制剂和参比制剂在空腹健康韩国男性志愿者中符合药代动力学等效性的监管标准。受试制剂和参比制剂的药效学特征相似。两种二甲双胍制剂总体上似乎耐受性良好。