Jaimes-Hernández Jorge, Meléndez-Mercado Claudia Irene, Mendoza-Fuentes Angélica, Aranda-Pereira Pablo, Castañeda-Hernández Gilberto
Servicio de Reumatología, Centro Médico ISSEMYM, Toluca, México.
Reumatol Clin. 2012 Sep-Oct;8(5):243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2012.03.013. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
To determine the clinical efficacy and safety of Leflunomide (LFN) 100 mg/week compared to low dose Methotrexate (MTX) 10 mg/week in a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial with 52 weeks of follow up in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients.
Patients who met ARC1987 criteria for RA were included. All patients had medical records, including laboratory tests and hand X-rays. Clinical evaluations for improvement and ACR and EULAR response criteria were performed. Statistical analysis for independent's samples between both groups defined a P value of ≤.05. Safety was evaluated by comparing the proportion of adverse events (AE) registered.
Of 90 patients screened; five were withdrawn; the remaining 85 patients were randomised: 43 LFN and 42 MTX. Sixty-three patients completed the study; 72% in the LFN group and 74.4% in the MTX group. ACR20 improvement criteria were achieved by LFN group in 90.3%, and in MTX 78.1% (P=.14) at week 52. EULAR improvement criteria applied at the end point showed a DAS28 score for the LFN group of 3.45, and for the MTX group was 3.67(P=.43). Total withdrawals, including loss during follow up, AE and lack of efficacy for each group was 12 patients in the LFN group, and 10 patients in the MTX group. Regarding safety, no serious AE of a life threatening nature were reported.
These outcomes confirm that LFN 100 mg/week offers an adequate and sustained improvement effect on the clinical manifestations of RA, similar to low dose treatment with MTX 10 mg/every week after 52 weeks of follow up; it may be a good therapeutic option alone or in combination with others anti-rheumatic drugs.
在一项针对类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的双盲、随机、对照试验中,随访52周,确定每周100毫克来氟米特(LFN)与每周10毫克低剂量甲氨蝶呤(MTX)相比的临床疗效和安全性。
纳入符合1987年美国风湿病学会(ARC)类风湿关节炎标准的患者。所有患者均有病历,包括实验室检查和手部X光片。进行了改善情况的临床评估以及美国风湿病学会(ACR)和欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)反应标准评估。两组之间独立样本的统计分析确定P值≤0.05。通过比较记录的不良事件(AE)比例来评估安全性。
在90例筛查患者中,5例退出;其余85例患者被随机分组:43例接受来氟米特治疗,42例接受甲氨蝶呤治疗。63例患者完成了研究;来氟米特组为72%,甲氨蝶呤组为74.4%。在第52周时,来氟米特组达到美国风湿病学会20%改善标准的比例为90.3%,甲氨蝶呤组为78.1%(P = 0.14)。终点时应用的欧洲抗风湿病联盟改善标准显示,来氟米特组的疾病活动度评分(DAS28)为3.45,甲氨蝶呤组为3.67(P = 0.43)。来氟米特组包括随访期间失访、不良事件和缺乏疗效的总退出人数为12例,甲氨蝶呤组为10例。关于安全性,未报告有危及生命的严重不良事件。
这些结果证实,每周100毫克来氟米特对类风湿关节炎的临床表现有充分且持续的改善作用,与每周10毫克低剂量甲氨蝶呤治疗52周后的效果相似;它可能是单独使用或与其他抗风湿药物联合使用的良好治疗选择。