Constant I, Louvet N, Guye M-L, Sabourdin N
Hôpital Armand-Trousseau, groupe hospitalier HUEP, UPMC, AP-HP, 26, avenue Arnold-Netter, 75012 Paris, France.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2012 Sep;31(9):709-23. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
The practice of pediatric anesthesia requires a regular update of scientific knowledge and technical skills. To provide the most adequate Continuing Medical Education programs, it is necessary to assess the practices of pediatric anesthesiologists. Thus, the objective of this survey was to draw a picture of the current clinical practices of general anesthesia in children, in France.
One thousand one hundred and fifty questionnaires were given to anesthesiologists involved in pediatric cases. These questionnaires collected information on various aspects of clinical practice relative to induction, maintenance, recovery from general anaesthesia and also classical debated points such as children with Upper Respiratory Infection (URI), emergence agitation, epileptoid signs or anaesthetic management of adenoidectomy. Differences in practices between CHG (general hospital), CHU (teaching hospital), LIBERAL (private) and PSPH (semi-private) hospitals were investigated.
There were 1025 questionnaires completed. Fifty-five percent of responders worked in public hospitals (CHG and CHU); 77% had a practice that was 25% or less of pediatric cases. In children from 3 to 10 years: 72% of respondents used always premedication and two thirds performed inhalation induction in more than 50% of cases. For induction, 53% used sevoflurane (SEVO) at 7 or 8%. Respondents from LIBERAL used higher SEVO concentrations. Tracheal intubation was performed with SEVO alone (37%), SEVO and propofol (55%) and SEVO with myorelaxant (8%), 93% of respondents used a bolus of opioid. For maintenance, the majority of respondents used SEVO associated with sufentanil; desflurane and remifentanil were more frequently used in CHU. Two thirds of respondents used N(2)O. Depth of anesthesia was commonly assessed by hemodynamic changes (52%), end tidal concentration of halogenated (38%) or automated devices based on EEG (7%). In children with URI, 98% of respondents used SEVO for anesthesia. To control the airway 42% used a tracheal tube, 30% a laryngeal mask and 20% a facial mask. Emergence agitation was an important concern for two thirds of respondents, while epileptoid signs were considered as important by only 20%. Eighty-nine percent of respondents practiced anesthesia for adenoidectomy. Anesthesia was induced by inhalation of SEVO 7-8% (41%), 6% (39%) or 4% (12%), 66% put an intravenous line (less frequently in LIBERAL). 67% of the responders managed adenoidectomy without any device to control the airway (more frequently in LIBERAL), 32% administrated a bolus of opioid (less frequently in LIBERAL).
This survey demonstrated that the practices regarding general anesthesia in children are relatively homogenous. Most of the differences appeared between LIBERAL and the others structures; the anaesthetic management for adenoidectomy illustrates these findings.
小儿麻醉实践需要定期更新科学知识和技术技能。为了提供最适当的继续医学教育项目,有必要评估小儿麻醉医生的实践情况。因此,本次调查的目的是描绘法国儿童全身麻醉的当前临床实践情况。
向参与小儿病例的麻醉医生发放了1150份问卷。这些问卷收集了与全身麻醉诱导、维持、苏醒以及一些经典争议点相关的临床实践各方面信息,如患有上呼吸道感染(URI)的儿童、苏醒期躁动、类癫痫体征或腺样体切除术的麻醉管理。调查了综合医院(CHG)、教学医院(CHU)、私立医院(LIBERAL)和半私立医院(PSPH)之间实践的差异。
共完成1025份问卷。55%的应答者在公立医院(CHG和CHU)工作;77%的应答者处理的小儿病例占其业务的25%或更少。对于3至10岁的儿童:72%的应答者总是使用术前用药,三分之二的应答者在超过50%的病例中采用吸入诱导。对于诱导,53%的应答者使用7%或8%的七氟烷(SEVO)。私立医院的应答者使用的SEVO浓度更高。单独使用SEVO进行气管插管的占37%,SEVO与丙泊酚联合使用的占55%,SEVO与肌松剂联合使用的占8%,93%的应答者使用一剂阿片类药物。对于维持,大多数应答者使用SEVO联合舒芬太尼;地氟烷和瑞芬太尼在教学医院使用得更频繁。三分之二的应答者使用N₂O。麻醉深度通常通过血流动力学变化评估(52%)、卤化物的呼气末浓度评估(38%)或基于脑电图的自动设备评估(7%)。对于患有URI的儿童,98%的应答者使用SEVO进行麻醉。为控制气道,42%的应答者使用气管导管,30%使用喉罩,20%使用面罩。三分之二的应答者将苏醒期躁动视为重要问题,而只有20%的应答者认为类癫痫体征很重要。89%的应答者进行腺样体切除术的麻醉。通过吸入7 - 8%的SEVO诱导麻醉的占41%,6%的占39%,4%的占12%,66%的应答者建立静脉通路(私立医院较少)。67% 的应答者在没有任何控制气道装置的情况下进行腺样体切除术(私立医院更常见),32%的应答者给予一剂阿片类药物(私立医院较少)。
本次调查表明,儿童全身麻醉的实践相对一致。大多数差异出现在私立医院与其他机构之间;腺样体切除术的麻醉管理说明了这些发现。