Nursing School of Central South University, 172 Tongzi Po Road, Changsha 410013, Hunan, China.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 Nov-Dec;55(3):564-9. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2012.06.006. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
This study compared levels of depression and social support among empty-nest elderly who living in the rural and urban area of Hunan province, China. This cross-sectional study enrolled 809 empty-nest elderly living throughout the province as the study respondents. The general information, depression conditions and social supports were investigated by using the self-made General Information Questionnaire, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS). Variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or frequency. Independent t-test and χ(2)-tests were used to compare the socio-demographic factors, depression score and social support scores of the rural empty-nest elderly to the urban empty-nest ones; multilevel modeling was used to analyze the socio-demographic factors and social support predicted the level of depression among the empty-nest old subjects. The differences in gender, education level, marital status, economic status, self-perceived income, insurance, children visit frequency and religious beliefs factors between rural and urban empty-nester old people were statistically significant (p<0.05). The average GDS score of rural group was (14.57 ± 5.43), which was higher than the average GDS score (13.18 ± 6.51) of urban group (p<0.01). Objective support scores showed statistical significance between the rural and urban empty-nest elderly (p<0.05). There are differences between rural and urban empty-nest elderly in the aspects of general data, depression status, social support and so on, we should intervene them effectively according to their different characteristics.
本研究比较了中国湖南省农村和城市空巢老人的抑郁水平和社会支持水平。这项横断面研究招募了全省 809 名空巢老人作为研究对象。采用自制的一般情况问卷、老年抑郁量表(GDS)和社会支持评定量表(SSRS)调查了一般情况、抑郁状况和社会支持情况。变量以均数±标准差(SD)或频率表示。采用独立 t 检验和 χ(2)-检验比较农村空巢老人与城市空巢老人的社会人口学因素、抑郁评分和社会支持评分;采用多水平模型分析社会人口学因素和社会支持对空巢老人抑郁水平的预测作用。城乡空巢老人在性别、文化程度、婚姻状况、经济状况、自我感觉收入、保险、子女探望频率和宗教信仰等方面存在差异(p<0.05)。农村组的 GDS 平均得分(14.57 ± 5.43)高于城市组的平均得分(13.18 ± 6.51)(p<0.01)。客观支持得分在城乡空巢老人之间存在统计学差异(p<0.05)。城乡空巢老人在一般资料、抑郁状况、社会支持等方面存在差异,应根据其不同特点进行有效干预。