• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工膝关节周围感染的两阶段再植入:宿主健康状况和感染微生物的影响

Two-stage reimplantation for periprosthetic knee infection: Influence of host health status and infecting microorganism.

作者信息

Tigani D, Trisolino G, Fosco M, Ben Ayad R, Costigliola P

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Santa Maria alle Scotte Hospital, Siena, Italy.

出版信息

Knee. 2013 Jan;20(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2012.06.004
PMID:22784976
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Two-stage revision is the gold standard treatment of TKA infection; nevertheless various factors may influence the success rate. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of the number of patient comorbidities together with virulence of infectious organism on prognosis of two-stage revision procedure in chronic peri-prosthetic knee infection; moreover we tried to demonstrate correlation between the presence of positive culture during re-implantation and re-infection rate.

METHODS

Thirty-eight cases of two-staged revision procedures for infected total knee arthroplasty were prospectively followed. The presence of high virulence microorganisms on the culture result and the number (more than three) of comorbidities were used as major risk factors. All cases were divided into three groups: Group 1 (10 patients without major risk factors), Group 2 (18 patients with only one major risk factor), Group 3 (10 patients with both of major risk factors).

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 65months (range 24-139months), there was infection recurrence in nine cases: four re-infections occurred with the same organism while five patients had re-infection with a different organism. Recurrence was higher in Group 3 (33% of the cases), lower in Group 2 (12% of the cases), whereas no infection occurred in Group 1. Finally in case of positive intraoperative cultures recurrence rate was 83%, whereas when specimens were negative we had only 12.5% of re-infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Even if standard protocol of two-stage revision has demonstrated good results when treating low-virulence infections or patients without associated risk factors, its application to more challenging condition cannot be assumed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of level of evidence.

摘要

背景

两阶段翻修术是全膝关节置换术(TKA)感染的金标准治疗方法;然而,多种因素可能会影响成功率。我们研究的目的是评估患者合并症数量以及感染病原体的毒力对慢性人工膝关节周围感染两阶段翻修手术预后的影响;此外,我们试图证明再次植入时培养阳性与再感染率之间的相关性。

方法

对38例感染性全膝关节置换术的两阶段翻修手术病例进行前瞻性随访。将培养结果中高毒力微生物的存在以及合并症数量(超过三种)用作主要危险因素。所有病例分为三组:第1组(10例无主要危险因素的患者),第2组(18例仅有一个主要危险因素的患者),第3组(10例有两个主要危险因素的患者)。

结果

平均随访65个月(范围24 - 139个月)后,有9例出现感染复发:4例再次感染为同一病原体,而5例患者再次感染为不同病原体。第3组的复发率较高(占病例的33%),第2组较低(占病例的12%),而第1组未发生感染。最后,术中培养阳性时复发率为83%,而标本为阴性时再感染率仅为12.5%。

结论

即使两阶段翻修的标准方案在治疗低毒力感染或无相关危险因素的患者时已显示出良好效果,但不能认为其适用于更具挑战性的情况。

证据水平

IV级,治疗性研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。

相似文献

1
Two-stage reimplantation for periprosthetic knee infection: Influence of host health status and infecting microorganism.人工膝关节周围感染的两阶段再植入:宿主健康状况和感染微生物的影响
Knee. 2013 Jan;20(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
2
[Management of deep infection after total knee arthroplasty].[全膝关节置换术后深部感染的管理]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Aug;26(8):918-21.
3
Knee arthrodesis using a customised modular intramedullary nail in failed infected total knee arthroplasty.采用定制模块化髓内钉治疗感染性全膝关节置换术后失败的膝关节融合术。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Jun;99(4):391-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.10.016. Epub 2013 Mar 17.
4
Long Term Treatment Results for Deep Infections of Total Knee Arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep;30(9):1623-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
5
Hand-made articulating spacers in two-stage revision for infected total knee arthroplasty: good outcome in 30 patients.手工制作的关节连接间隔器用于感染性全膝关节置换二期翻修术:30例患者疗效良好。
Acta Orthop. 2008 Oct;79(5):674-82. doi: 10.1080/17453670810016704.
6
[Infected total knee prosthesis. Guidance for therapeutic choice].[感染性全膝关节假体。治疗选择指南]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1994;80(7):626-33.
7
Clinical outcome and microbiological findings using antibiotic-loaded spacers in two-stage revision of prosthetic joint infections.采用载抗生素骨水泥间隔器在二期翻修治疗人工关节感染的临床结果和微生物学研究
J Infect. 2011 Jul;63(1):23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2011.04.014. Epub 2011 May 19.
8
Are Frozen Sections and MSIS Criteria Reliable at the Time of Reimplantation of Two-stage Revision Arthroplasty?在两阶段翻修关节成形术再次植入时,冰冻切片和微卫星不稳定性(MSIS)标准是否可靠?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1619-26. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4673-3.
9
A comparison of gentamicin-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate bead implantation to conventional parenteral antibiotic therapy in infected total hip and knee arthroplasty.庆大霉素负载的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯珠粒植入术与传统胃肠外抗生素疗法在感染性全髋关节和膝关节置换术中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Oct(295):96-101.
10
Evaluation of preoperative cultures before second-stage reimplantation of a total knee prosthesis complicated by infection. A comparison-group study.全膝关节假体感染并发症二期再植入术前培养物的评估。一项对比组研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Nov;82(11):1552-7. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200011000-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
No difference in failure between static, articulating, and prosthetic low-friction spacers for periprosthetic joint infection of total knee arthroplasty.在全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染中,静态、可活动和假体低摩擦间隔物在治疗失败方面无差异。
J Bone Jt Infect. 2025 Jul 30;10(4):243-253. doi: 10.5194/jbji-10-243-2025. eCollection 2025.
2
The Use of Intraoperative Cell Salvage in Two-Stage Revision of Septic Hip Arthroplasties: A Double-Center Retrospective Study.术中细胞回收技术在感染性髋关节置换二期翻修术中的应用:一项双中心回顾性研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 May 30;12(6):982. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12060982.
3
Comparable clinical outcomes of culture-negative and culture-positive periprosthetic joint infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
培养阴性和培养阳性假体周围关节感染的临床结局可比:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 16;18(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03692-x.
4
Are Static Spacers Superior to Articulated Spacers in the Staged Treatment of Infected Primary Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.在感染性初次膝关节置换分期治疗中,静态间隔物是否优于活动间隔物?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 18;11(16):4854. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164854.
5
The outcomes of surgical management of failed two-stage revision knee arthroplasty.两阶段翻修膝关节置换术后失败的手术治疗结果。
Acta Biomed. 2021 Jul 1;92(3):e2021197. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i3.10956.
6
Amputation as a Complication after Total Knee Replacement, is it a Real Concern to be Discussed?: A Systematic Review.全膝关节置换术后截肢作为一种并发症,是否真的需要讨论?一项系统评价
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2021 Jan;9(1):9-21. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2020.53892.2692.
7
Classifications in Brief: The McPherson Classification of Periprosthetic Infection.简要分类:麦克弗森人工关节周围感染分类法
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Apr;478(4):903-908. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001133.
8
Periprosthetic Joint Infection Does Not Preclude Good Outcomes after a Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A 7-Year Follow-Up Study of 144 Retrospective Cases.假体周围关节感染并不会影响翻修全膝关节置换术后的良好结局:144 例回顾性病例的 7 年随访研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Aug 12;2018:2582140. doi: 10.1155/2018/2582140. eCollection 2018.
9
Late Reinfection May Recur More Than 5 Years After Reimplantation of THA and TKA: Analysis of Pathogen Factors.全髋关节置换术(THA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)翻修术后5年以上可能会再次发生晚期感染:病原体因素分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):345-352. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000050.
10
The challenge of nonunion after osteosynthesis of the clavicle: is it a biomechanical or infection problem?锁骨接骨术后骨不连的挑战:这是一个生物力学问题还是感染问题?
Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2017 Sep-Dec;14(3):372-378. doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2017.14.3.372. Epub 2017 Dec 27.