Suppr超能文献

创伤后膝关节关节炎:无需取出内固定装置的导航全膝关节置换术

Post traumatic knee arthritis: navigated total knee replacement without hardware removal.

作者信息

Manzotti Alfonso, Pullen Chris, Cerveri Pietro, Chemello Cesare, Confalonieri Norberto

机构信息

Ist Orthopedic Department, C.T.O. Hospital, Via Bignami 1, 20100 Milan, Italy.

Orthopaedic Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Knee. 2014 Jan;21(1):290-4. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.06.008. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Authors present the results of a series of navigated total knee replacements (TKR) without hardware removal in patients with post-traumatic arthritis following femoral fractures. The purpose of the paper was to determine the effectiveness of computer-assisted TKR in these patients compared to routine primary implants.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with post-traumatic knee arthritis following a distal femoral fracture and retained hardware were included in the study (group I). Patients in the study group were matched with patients who had undergone a computer navigated TKR using the same implant and software (group II). The indication for TKR in all group II patients was atraumatic arthritis and surgery was performed in the same period as the study group. Patients were matched for age, gender, pre-operative range of motion, severity of arthritis pre-operatively, type and grade of deformity and implant features.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in surgical time, hospital staying or intra-operative and post-operative complications between the two study groups. At the latest follow-up no statistically significant difference was seen for the Knee Society Score and WOMAC indices. Implant alignment and radiological parameters were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that post-traumatic knee arthritis following prior distal femoral fracture can be safely managed using a computer navigated TKR without hardware removal. Comparison between this patient group and a matched group with atraumatic arthritis showed similar post-operative results and complication rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

背景

作者展示了一系列针对股骨骨折后创伤性关节炎患者的导航全膝关节置换术(TKR)的结果,术中未取出内固定物。本文的目的是确定与常规初次植入相比,计算机辅助TKR在这些患者中的有效性。

方法

本研究纳入了16例股骨远端骨折后创伤性膝关节炎且内固定物留存的患者(I组)。研究组患者与使用相同植入物和软件接受计算机导航TKR的患者进行匹配(II组)。II组所有患者的TKR指征均为非创伤性关节炎,且手术与研究组在同一时期进行。对患者的年龄、性别、术前活动范围、术前关节炎严重程度、畸形类型和程度以及植入物特征进行匹配。

结果

两个研究组在手术时间、住院时间或术中和术后并发症方面均无统计学显著差异。在最近一次随访时,膝关节协会评分和WOMAC指数均无统计学显著差异。两组的植入物对线和放射学参数相似。

结论

本研究表明,对于既往股骨远端骨折后的创伤性膝关节炎,使用计算机导航TKR且不取出内固定物可安全治疗。该患者组与匹配的非创伤性关节炎组之间的比较显示,术后结果和并发症发生率相似。

证据水平

III级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验