• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

择期血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术前医学评估的影响

Influence of preoperative medical assessment prior to elective endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

作者信息

Ohrlander T, Nessvi S, Gottsäter A, Dencker M, Acosta S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Eksjö County Hospital, Eksjö, Sweden.

出版信息

Int Angiol. 2012 Aug;31(4):368-75.

PMID:22801403
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare preoperative patient evaluation by a vascular physician with a standardized workup protocol prior to elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), in terms of differences in patient medication and mortality.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with infrarenal AAA treated with standard EVAR from 1998 to 2006 (group 2) and 2007 to 2011 (group 1) were compared. Patients in group 1 (N.=201) were investigated preoperatively by a vascular physician, evaluating comorbidities and medication. Patients in group 2 (N.=304) underwent a standardized preoperative work-up including spirometry and echocardiography. Median time of follow-up was 23 months in group 1 and 71 months in group 2.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients who had on-going medication with anti-platelet and lipid lowering medication at admission was higher in group 1 compared to group 2 (62% versus 51%; P=0.013 and 68% versus 35%; P<0.001). In group 1, the proportion of newly instituted or increased dosage of anti-hypertensive, anti-platelet or lipid lowering medication at preoperative evaluation was 40%, 24% and 31%, respectively. The total cost for preoperative assessment per patient was 272 € in group 1 and 293 € in group 2 (P<0.001). There was no difference in 30-day (P=0.29) or long-term (P=0.24) mortality between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative assessment by a vascular physician resulted in lower costs and improvement of medication against atherosclerosis, uncontrolled hypertension and perioperative ischemic cardiac events, but mortality was unaffected.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较血管科医生在择期腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术(EVAR)治疗腹主动脉瘤(AAA)前,依据标准化检查方案进行的术前患者评估,在患者用药和死亡率方面的差异。

方法

比较1998年至2006年(第2组)和2007年至2011年(第1组)接受标准EVAR治疗的连续性肾下腹主动脉瘤患者。第1组(N = 201)患者术前由血管科医生进行评估,评估合并症和用药情况。第2组(N = 304)患者接受包括肺活量测定和超声心动图在内的标准化术前检查。第1组的中位随访时间为23个月,第2组为71个月。

结果

与第2组相比,第1组入院时正在使用抗血小板和降脂药物的患者比例更高(62%对51%;P = 0.013以及68%对35%;P < 0.001)。在第1组中,术前评估时新开始使用或增加剂量的抗高血压、抗血小板或降脂药物的比例分别为40%、24%和31%。第1组每位患者术前评估的总费用为272欧元,第2组为293欧元(P < 0.001)。两组之间30天(P = 0.29)或长期(P = 0.24)死亡率无差异。

结论

血管科医生进行的术前评估可降低成本,并改善针对动脉粥样硬化、未控制的高血压和围手术期缺血性心脏事件的药物治疗,但死亡率未受影响。

相似文献

1
Influence of preoperative medical assessment prior to elective endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm.择期血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术前医学评估的影响
Int Angiol. 2012 Aug;31(4):368-75.
2
Impact of preoperative evaluation by vascular physician on mortality in patients undergoing elective endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm.血管内科医生进行的术前评估对接受择期腹主动脉瘤血管腔内修复术患者死亡率的影响。
Int Angiol. 2016 Dec;35(6):579-585. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
3
Preoperative spirometry results as a determinant for long-term mortality after EVAR for AAA.术前肺功能检查结果是腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后长期死亡率的决定因素。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Jan;43(1):43-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.09.028. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
4
Preoperative statin therapy is associated with improved outcomes and resource utilization in patients undergoing aortic aneurysm repair.术前他汀类药物治疗与接受主动脉瘤修复的患者的改善结局和资源利用相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Jun;51(6):1390-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.01.028. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
5
The rationale for lowering the size threshold in elective endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.降低择期血管内修复腹主动脉瘤的大小阈值的基本原理。
J Endovasc Ther. 2011 Jun;18(3):308-13. doi: 10.1583/10-3371.1.
6
Cardiovascular predictors for long-term mortality after EVAR for AAA.腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后长期死亡率的心血管预测因素。
Vasc Med. 2011 Dec;16(6):422-7. doi: 10.1177/1358863X11425713.
7
Analysis of outcome after using high-risk criteria selection to surgery versus endovascular repair in the modern era of abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment.分析在现代腹主动脉瘤治疗时代,使用高危标准选择手术与血管内修复的结果。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Apr;39(4):403-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.12.009. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
8
Outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in high-risk patients.高危患者血管腔内腹主动脉瘤修复术的疗效
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Apr;61(4):862-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.11.081. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
9
Elective Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Continues to Cost More than Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.选择性血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术的成本仍然高于开放性腹主动脉瘤修复术。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Feb;39:111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.05.091. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
10
A single-centre experience of the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: clinical and anatomic characteristics of open versus endovascular repair.腹主动脉瘤破裂治疗的单中心经验:开放手术与血管腔内修复的临床及解剖学特征
Int Angiol. 2012 Aug;31(4):386-92.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparable mid-term survival in patients undergoing elective fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair and endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm.接受择期开窗血管腔内动脉瘤修复术和腹主动脉瘤血管腔内动脉瘤修复术患者的中期生存率相当。
SAGE Open Med. 2014 Jan 28;2:2050312113519986. doi: 10.1177/2050312113519986. eCollection 2014.