Suppr超能文献

L2 - 3和L3 - 4水平的脊髓麻醉:镇痛效果与血流动力学反应的比较

Spinal anesthesia at the L2-3 and L3-4 levels: comparison of analgesia and hemodynamic response.

作者信息

Sarić Jadranka Pavicić, Mikulandra Simon, Gustin Denis, Matasić Hrvoje, Tomulić Katarina, Dokoza Katarina Pavicić

机构信息

University of Zagreb, "Merkur" University Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Coll Antropol. 2012 Mar;36(1):151-6.

Abstract

Aim of this study was to evaluate level of analgesia and hemodynamic response to spinal anesthesia obtained by administering 15 mg 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine at L2-3 vs. L3-4 interspace for inguinal herniorrhaphy, since studies comparing analgesia and hemodynamic response at the L2-3 vs. L3-4 interspaces are lacking. In a prospective, randomized clinical study that encountered 72 patients undergoing elective inguinal herniorrhaphy randomly allocated in to two equal groups L2-3 (N = 36) and L3-4 (N = 36) according to lumbar interspace where intrathecal injection of bupivacaine was administered. Analgesia was evaluated by intraoperative "rescue" fentanyl requirements, the absence of pain and the maximal visual analogue scale (VAS) scores reached per patient during the operation. The severity of intraoperative pain was quantified by a 10 cm VAS scale (VAS 0: no pain to 10: worst pain imaginable) every 5 minutes after skin incision until the end of the operation. VAS > 3 was treated with intravenous fentanyl 25 microg. Hemodynamic response was monitored and evaluated, heart rate was continuously monitored as well as, baseline systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure prior to induction and every 5 minute after applying spinal anesthesia until surgical completion. Intraoperative fentanyl requirements were significantly higher in group L3-4 (L2-3 0%, 97.5% confidence interval [CI] 0.0-0.11 vs. L3-4 17%, 95% CI 0.07-0.32, p = 0.025). Absence of pain was significantly higher in L2-3 group at the beginning of the operation (L2-3 89%, 95% CI 0.74-0.96 vs. L3-4 67%, 95% CI 0.50-0.79, p = 0.047). The maximal VAS scores reached per patient during the operation in L2-3 group were lower then in L3-4 group (L2-3 median [M] 0, range [R] 0-3, L3-4 M 0, R 0-8, p = 0.014). There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in the incidence of hypotension (L2-3 19%, 95% CI 0.09-0.35 vs. L3-4 17%, 95% CI 0.07-0.32) and bradycardia (L2-3 19%, 95% CI 0.09-0.35 vs. L3-4 8%, 95% CI 0.02-0.23). Spinal anesthesia with isobaric bupivacaine administered in L2-3 interspace for inguinal herniorrhaphy provides superior analgesia and equal hemodynamic stability as compared to neuroaxial anesthesia administered in the L3-4 interspace.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估在L2 - 3间隙与L3 - 4间隙给予15 mg 0.5%等比重布比卡因用于腹股沟疝修补术时脊髓麻醉的镇痛水平和血流动力学反应,因为目前缺乏比较L2 - 3间隙与L3 - 4间隙镇痛和血流动力学反应的研究。在一项前瞻性随机临床研究中,纳入72例行择期腹股沟疝修补术的患者,根据鞘内注射布比卡因的腰椎间隙将其随机分为两组,L2 - 3组(N = 36)和L3 - 4组(N = 36)。通过术中“补救”芬太尼需求量、无痛情况以及每位患者在手术期间达到的最大视觉模拟评分(VAS)来评估镇痛效果。术中疼痛程度通过10 cm VAS量表(VAS 0:无疼痛至10:可想象的最剧烈疼痛)在皮肤切开后每5分钟进行量化,直至手术结束。VAS > 3时给予静脉注射芬太尼25μg。监测并评估血流动力学反应,持续监测心率以及诱导前、应用脊髓麻醉后每5分钟直至手术结束时的基线收缩压、舒张压和平均动脉压。L3 - 4组术中芬太尼需求量显著更高(L2 - 3组为0%,97.5%置信区间[CI] 0.0 - 0.11;L3 - 4组为17%,95% CI 0.07 - 0.32,p = 0.025)。手术开始时L2 - 3组无痛情况显著更高(L2 - 3组为89%,95% CI 0.74 - 0.96;L3 - 4组为67%,95% CI 0.50 - 0.79,p = 0.047)。L2 - 3组患者在手术期间达到的最大VAS评分低于L3 - 4组(L2 - 3组中位数[M]为0,范围[R]为0 - 3;L3 - 4组M为0,R为0 - 8,p = 0.014)。低血压发生率(L2 - 3组为19%,95% CI 0.09 - 0.35;L3 - 4组为17%,95% CI 0.07 - 0.32)和心动过缓发生率(L2 - 3组为19%,95% CI 0.09 - 0.35;L3 - 4组为8%,95% CI 0.02 - 0.23)无显著差异(p > 0.05)。与在L3 - 4间隙进行的神经轴麻醉相比,在L2 - 3间隙给予等比重布比卡因用于腹股沟疝修补术可提供更好的镇痛效果和同等的血流动力学稳定性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验