Jang Seonah, Yong Hwan Seok, Doo Kyung Won, Kang Eun-Young, Woo Ok Hee, Choi Eun Jung
Department of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Acta Radiol. 2012 Oct 1;53(8):839-44. doi: 10.1258/ar.2012.110604. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
Three known risk factors for aortic atherosclerosis predict the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD): aortic calcification (AC), aortic wall thickness (AWT), and aortic distensibility (AD).
To determine the relationship of AC, AWT, and AD with the severity of CAD.
A total of 104 patients who underwent both coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and invasive coronary angiography were enrolled. The severity of CAD was assessed by three methods: the segment involvement score (SIS), the segment stenosis score (SSS), and the modified Gensini score (mG). We quantified AC using the Agatston method on low-dose ungated chest CT (LDCT). We measured AWT at the thickest portion of the descending thoracic aorta on CCTA. AD was calculated as the difference between the maximum and minimum areas of the ascending aorta and the pulse pressure. The relationships between the severity of CAD and the three aortic factors were assessed.
The AC and AWT of the thoracic aorta were significantly higher in the occlusive CAD (OCAD) group (1984.21 ± 2986.10 vs. 733.00 ± 1648.71, P = 0.01; 4.13 ± 1.48 vs. 3.40 ± 1.01, P = 0.22). Patients with OCAD had more than one epicardial coronary artery with >50% luminal stenosis. The AC (r = 0.453 with SIS; r = 0.454 with SSS; r = 0.427 with mG) and the AWT (r = 0.279 with SIS; r = 0.324 with SSS; r = 0.304 with mG) were significantly correlated with all three methods, and the AD was negatively correlated with the SIS (r = - 0.221, P < 0.05, respectively) in the unadjusted model. After adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, only the correlations between AC and all three methods assessing CAD remained significant.
There are significant relationships between AC, AWT and AD and severity of CAD. In particular, AC measured on LDCT is the most consistent predictor of severity of CAD.
已知的三个主动脉粥样硬化风险因素可预测冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的严重程度:主动脉钙化(AC)、主动脉壁厚度(AWT)和主动脉扩张性(AD)。
确定AC、AWT和AD与CAD严重程度之间的关系。
共纳入104例同时接受冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)和有创冠状动脉造影的患者。通过三种方法评估CAD的严重程度:节段累及评分(SIS)、节段狭窄评分(SSS)和改良Gensini评分(mG)。我们在低剂量非门控胸部CT(LDCT)上使用Agatston方法对AC进行量化。我们在CCTA上测量胸降主动脉最厚处的AWT。AD计算为升主动脉最大和最小面积之差与脉压。评估CAD严重程度与三个主动脉因素之间的关系。
闭塞性CAD(OCAD)组胸主动脉的AC和AWT显著更高(1984.21±2986.10 vs. 733.00±1648.71,P = 0.01;4.13±1.48 vs. 3.40±1.01,P = 0.22)。OCAD患者有一条以上心外膜冠状动脉管腔狭窄>50%。在未调整模型中,AC(与SIS的r = 0.453;与SSS的r = 0.454;与mG的r = 0.427)和AWT(与SIS的r = 0.279;与SSS的r = 0.324;与mG的r = 0.304)与所有三种方法均显著相关,而AD与SIS呈负相关(r = - 0.221,P < 0.05)。在调整心血管危险因素后,仅AC与评估CAD的所有三种方法之间的相关性仍然显著。
AC、AWT和AD与CAD严重程度之间存在显著关系。特别是,在LDCT上测量的AC是CAD严重程度最一致的预测指标。