Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione, CNR, Rome, Italy.
Biol Lett. 2012 Oct 23;8(5):757-9. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0534. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
Although most primates live in groups, experiments on reciprocity usually test individuals in dyads. This could hide the processes emerging in richer social settings, reducing the ecological validity of the results. We run an experiment on reciprocal food transfers testing capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in triads, so that subjects could choose to allow access to their food to either of their two partners. We tested the hypothesis that partner choice was related to a comparison of long-term social bonds with the two partners, more than to a comparison of recent food transfer events from the two partners. The results confirmed this hypothesis, thus supporting the notion that reciprocal partner preferences are based on long-term accounts of benefits that have been exchanged.
尽管大多数灵长类动物生活在群体中,但互惠实验通常在对偶个体中进行。这可能会掩盖在更丰富的社会环境中出现的过程,降低结果的生态有效性。我们在一个三人小组中对互惠食物转移进行了一项实验,以测试卷尾猴(Cebus apella),这样被试就可以选择允许他们的食物给他们的两个伙伴中的任何一个。我们测试了一个假设,即伙伴选择与与两个伙伴的长期社会关系的比较有关,而不是与两个伙伴最近的食物转移事件的比较有关。结果证实了这一假设,因此支持了互惠伙伴偏好是基于对已经交换的利益的长期考虑的观点。