BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), stroke risk stratification schemes have been developed to optimize antithrombotic treatment. The CHADS(2) score is frequently used but has limitations. The CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc score improves risk prediction. Our objectives are to describe CHADS(2) and CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc score distribution in a cohort of patients with AF and first-ever ischaemic stroke (FIS) and to identify differences in embolic risk stratification.

METHODS

Our cohort included 589 patients with FIS, previous modified Rankin score ≤ 3, and non-valvular AF. We recorded demographic data, vascular risk factors, and antithrombotic pre-treatment. The CHADS(2) and CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc scores were calculated according to clinical status before stroke onset.

RESULTS

In 186 (31.6%) patients, AF was previously unknown. Of patients with known AF and CHADS(2) ≥ 2 (n=320), only 103 (32.2%) were taking anticoagulants; more than half of these patients had an INR <2. The CHADS(2) score placed 142 (24.1%) patients in the low-intermediate risk (score ≤ 1) category compared with 21 (3.6%) with CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc, P < 0.001. Applying CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc reclassified 121 (85.2%) subjects in the CHADS(2) low-intermediate risk category as high risk (≥ 2), an indication for anticoagulants. Of the 21 patients who suffered a stroke despite their low CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc score (≤ 1), seven (33.3%) reported alcohol overuse, and six (28.5%) had a concomitant stroke etiology.

CONCLUSIONS

About 25% of FIS patients with AF had a CHADS(2) score ≤ 1. Despite the high CHADS(2) score of our population, few patients received the recommended antithrombotic treatment according to their thromboembolic risk. Using the CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc schema significantly increased the percentage of patients indicated for anticoagulation.