Suppr超能文献

按外科专业评估基底细胞癌的手术切缘

Evaluation of surgical margins in Basal cell carcinoma by surgical specialty.

作者信息

Bassas P, Hilari H, Bodet D, Serra M, Kennedy F E, García-Patos V

机构信息

Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España.

出版信息

Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2013 Mar;104(2):133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jul 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Complete surgical excision is the most common treatment for basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and this intervention is often performed by surgeons who are not dermatologists (e.g., plastic surgeons, general surgeons, oral and maxillofacial surgeons, ophthalmologists, and otorhinolaryngologists).

OBJECTIVES

To determine positive margin rates in BCCs removed by surgeons from different specialties and to identify clinical and pathologic factors that might explain potential differences between specialties.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the pathology reports of all BCCs diagnosed at Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron between January 2009 and March 2001. The statistical methods included a descriptive analysis of clinical and pathologic variables, standard statistical analyses, and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

We included 921 BCCs from 750 patients; 549 of the tumors had been excised by a dermatologist. The overall positive margin rate was 12.6%, but the rate for tumors removed by dermatologists was significantly lower than that for those removed by other specialists (6.7% vs 21.5%). There was a 3.8-fold increased relative risk of positive margins following excision by a surgeon who was not a dermatologist, independently of patient age, tumor site, maximum diameter of the resected specimen, and histologic subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

Accurate macroscopic identification of tumor margins, which are often difficult to see, and familiarity with the natural history of BCC are key factors in the successful surgical treatment of BCCs. The higher rate of tumor-free margins achieved by dermatologists in this study is probably mainly due to their greater experience in these 2 areas.

摘要

背景

手术完整切除是基底细胞癌(BCC)最常见的治疗方法,而进行这种干预的外科医生通常并非皮肤科医生(例如整形外科医生、普通外科医生、口腔颌面外科医生、眼科医生和耳鼻喉科医生)。

目的

确定不同专科医生切除的基底细胞癌的切缘阳性率,并识别可能解释各专科之间潜在差异的临床和病理因素。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2009年1月至2001年3月在巴塞罗那瓦尔德希伯伦大学医院诊断的所有基底细胞癌的病理报告。统计方法包括对临床和病理变量的描述性分析、标准统计分析以及多因素逻辑回归分析。

结果

我们纳入了来自750例患者的921例基底细胞癌;其中549例肿瘤由皮肤科医生切除。总体切缘阳性率为12.6%,但皮肤科医生切除的肿瘤的切缘阳性率显著低于其他专科医生切除的肿瘤(6.7%对21.5%)。非皮肤科医生切除肿瘤后切缘阳性的相对风险增加了3.8倍,这与患者年龄、肿瘤部位、切除标本的最大直径和组织学亚型无关。

结论

准确宏观识别通常难以看清的肿瘤边缘以及熟悉基底细胞癌的自然病程是基底细胞癌手术成功治疗的关键因素。在本研究中,皮肤科医生实现的无瘤切缘率较高可能主要归因于他们在这两个方面更丰富的经验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验