• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

按外科专业评估基底细胞癌的手术切缘

Evaluation of surgical margins in Basal cell carcinoma by surgical specialty.

作者信息

Bassas P, Hilari H, Bodet D, Serra M, Kennedy F E, García-Patos V

机构信息

Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España.

出版信息

Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2013 Mar;104(2):133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.ad.2012.06.001
PMID:22835227
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Complete surgical excision is the most common treatment for basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and this intervention is often performed by surgeons who are not dermatologists (e.g., plastic surgeons, general surgeons, oral and maxillofacial surgeons, ophthalmologists, and otorhinolaryngologists).

OBJECTIVES

To determine positive margin rates in BCCs removed by surgeons from different specialties and to identify clinical and pathologic factors that might explain potential differences between specialties.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the pathology reports of all BCCs diagnosed at Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron between January 2009 and March 2001. The statistical methods included a descriptive analysis of clinical and pathologic variables, standard statistical analyses, and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

We included 921 BCCs from 750 patients; 549 of the tumors had been excised by a dermatologist. The overall positive margin rate was 12.6%, but the rate for tumors removed by dermatologists was significantly lower than that for those removed by other specialists (6.7% vs 21.5%). There was a 3.8-fold increased relative risk of positive margins following excision by a surgeon who was not a dermatologist, independently of patient age, tumor site, maximum diameter of the resected specimen, and histologic subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

Accurate macroscopic identification of tumor margins, which are often difficult to see, and familiarity with the natural history of BCC are key factors in the successful surgical treatment of BCCs. The higher rate of tumor-free margins achieved by dermatologists in this study is probably mainly due to their greater experience in these 2 areas.

摘要

背景

手术完整切除是基底细胞癌(BCC)最常见的治疗方法,而进行这种干预的外科医生通常并非皮肤科医生(例如整形外科医生、普通外科医生、口腔颌面外科医生、眼科医生和耳鼻喉科医生)。

目的

确定不同专科医生切除的基底细胞癌的切缘阳性率,并识别可能解释各专科之间潜在差异的临床和病理因素。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2009年1月至2001年3月在巴塞罗那瓦尔德希伯伦大学医院诊断的所有基底细胞癌的病理报告。统计方法包括对临床和病理变量的描述性分析、标准统计分析以及多因素逻辑回归分析。

结果

我们纳入了来自750例患者的921例基底细胞癌;其中549例肿瘤由皮肤科医生切除。总体切缘阳性率为12.6%,但皮肤科医生切除的肿瘤的切缘阳性率显著低于其他专科医生切除的肿瘤(6.7%对21.5%)。非皮肤科医生切除肿瘤后切缘阳性的相对风险增加了3.8倍,这与患者年龄、肿瘤部位、切除标本的最大直径和组织学亚型无关。

结论

准确宏观识别通常难以看清的肿瘤边缘以及熟悉基底细胞癌的自然病程是基底细胞癌手术成功治疗的关键因素。在本研究中,皮肤科医生实现的无瘤切缘率较高可能主要归因于他们在这两个方面更丰富的经验。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of surgical margins in Basal cell carcinoma by surgical specialty.按外科专业评估基底细胞癌的手术切缘
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2013 Mar;104(2):133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
2
Differences in Rate of Complete Excision of Basal Cell Carcinoma by Dermatologists, Plastic Surgeons and General Practitioners: A Large Cross-Sectional Study.皮肤科医生、整形外科医生和全科医生切除基底细胞癌完全切除率的差异:一项大型横断面研究。
Dermatology. 2018;234(3-4):86-91. doi: 10.1159/000490344. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
3
The specialty of the treating physician affects the likelihood of tumor-free resection margins for basal cell carcinoma: results from a multi-institutional retrospective study.主治医生的专业会影响基底细胞癌实现无瘤切缘的可能性:一项多机构回顾性研究的结果
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001 Feb;44(2):224-30. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2001.110396.
4
Efficacy of narrow-margin excision of well-demarcated primary facial basal cell carcinomas.界限清楚的原发性面部基底细胞癌窄切缘切除的疗效
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005 Sep;53(3):464-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.03.038.
5
Positive compared with negative margins in a single-centre retrospective study on 3957 consecutive excisions of basal cell carcinomas. Associated risk factors and preferred surgical management.在一项针对3957例连续切除的基底细胞癌的单中心回顾性研究中,切缘阳性与阴性的比较。相关危险因素及首选手术治疗方法。
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2014 Feb;48(1):38-43. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2013.800526. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
6
A retrospective study of 694 Basal Cell Carcinoma excisions to quantify deep margin documentation and clearance compared to histological type and surgical margin.一项对694例基底细胞癌切除术的回顾性研究,旨在量化与组织学类型和手术切缘相关的深部切缘记录及切缘情况。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Nov;72(11):1805-1812. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
7
Agreement between histological subtype on punch biopsy and surgical excision in primary basal cell carcinoma.原发性基底细胞癌经皮穿刺活检与手术切除的组织学亚型一致性。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013 Jul;27(7):894-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04608.x. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
8
Does loupe magnification reduce the gap between the macroscopic and microscopic border of a Basal cell carcinoma?: a prospective clinical study.头戴放大镜放大是否能缩小基底细胞癌宏观边界与微观边界之间的差距?一项前瞻性临床研究。
Ann Plast Surg. 2014 May;72(5):579-83. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31826524df.
9
Nasal basal cell carcinomas. Can we reduce surgical margins to 3mm with complete excision?鼻基底细胞癌。我们能否通过完整切除将手术切缘缩小至3毫米?
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2016 Aug;61(4):241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
10
Nonpersistence of basal cell carcinoma after diagnostic shave biopsy: reconstruction when specimen is negative during surgery.诊断性削切活检后基底细胞癌未持续存在:手术时标本为阴性时的重建
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Jun;74(6):695-8. doi: 10.1097/01.SAP.0000462324.61391.04.

引用本文的文献

1
Margin Involvement After Excision with Preoperative Dermoscopic Assessment of Head and Neck Basal Cell Carcinomas - a Retrospective Study.术前皮肤镜评估对头颈部基底细胞癌切除术后切缘累及情况的回顾性研究
Cancer Manag Res. 2025 Aug 14;17:1643-1656. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S519809. eCollection 2025.
2
Adequacy of surgical margins, re-excision, and evaluation of factors associated with recurrence: a retrospective study of 769 basal cell carcinomas.切缘充分性、再次切除以及与复发相关因素的评估:769 例基底细胞癌的回顾性研究。
An Bras Dermatol. 2023 Jul-Aug;98(4):449-459. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2022.07.005. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
3
Clinicopathological Factors Associated with Incomplete Excision of High-risk Basal Cell Carcinoma.
与高危基底细胞癌不完全切除相关的临床病理因素。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2021 Jul 13;101(7):adv00496. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3856.
4
Surgery for Bowen Disease: Clinicopathological Factors Associated With Incomplete Excision.鲍恩病的手术治疗:与切除不完全相关的临床病理因素
Dermatol Pract Concept. 2021 Apr 12;11(2):e2021046. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1102a46. eCollection 2021 Mar.
5
Basal cell carcinoma with compromised margins: retrospective study of management, evolution, and prognosis.基底细胞癌伴边缘侵犯:治疗、演变和预后的回顾性研究。
An Bras Dermatol. 2021 Jan-Feb;96(1):17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
6
Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Primary Versus Recurrent or Incompletely Excised Facial High-risk Basal Cell Carcinomas.用于原发性与复发性或切除不完全的面部高危基底细胞癌的莫氏显微外科手术
Acta Derm Venereol. 2021 Feb 2;101(2):adv00381. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3698.
7
Factors associated with incomplete surgical margins in basal cell carcinoma of the head and neck.头颈部基底细胞癌手术切缘不完整的相关因素。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Nov-Dec;87(6):695-701. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.02.007. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
8
Differences in Rate of Complete Excision of Basal Cell Carcinoma by Dermatologists, Plastic Surgeons and General Practitioners: A Large Cross-Sectional Study.皮肤科医生、整形外科医生和全科医生切除基底细胞癌完全切除率的差异:一项大型横断面研究。
Dermatology. 2018;234(3-4):86-91. doi: 10.1159/000490344. Epub 2018 Aug 7.