Teoh May, Beveridge Sabeena, Wood Katie, Whitaker Stephen, Adams Elizabeth, Rickard Donna, Jordan Tom, Nisbet Andrew, Clark Catharine H
Department of Oncology, St. Luke's Cancer Centre, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
Med Dosim. 2013 Spring;38(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jul 28.
Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET)-guided focal dose escalation in oropharyngeal cancer may potentially improve local control. We evaluated the feasibility of this approach using volumetric-modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) and compared these plans with fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) focal dose escalation plans.
An initial study of 20 patients compared RapidArc with fixed-field IMRT using standard dose prescriptions. From this cohort, 10 were included in a dose escalation planning study. Dose escalation was applied to ¹⁸F-FDG-PET-positive regions in the primary tumor at dose levels of 5% (DL1), 10% (DL2), and 15% (DL3) above standard radical dose (65 Gy in 30 fractions). Fixed-field IMRT and double-arc RapidArc plans were generated for each dataset. Dose-volume histograms were used for plan evaluation and comparison. The Paddick conformity index (CI(Paddick)) and monitor units (MU) for each plan were recorded and compared. Both IMRT and RapidArc produced clinically acceptable plans and achieved planning objectives for target volumes. Dose conformity was significantly better in the RapidArc plans, with lower CI(Paddick) scores in both primary (PTV1) and elective (PTV2) planning target volumes (largest difference in PTV1 at DL3; 0.81 ± 0.03 [RapidArc] vs. 0.77 ± 0.07 [IMRT], p = 0.04). Maximum dose constraints for spinal cord and brainstem were not exceeded in both RapidArc and IMRT plans, but mean doses were higher with RapidArc (by 2.7 ± 1 Gy for spinal cord and 1.9 ± 1 Gy for brainstem). Contralateral parotid mean dose was lower with RapidArc, which was statistically significant at DL1 (29.0 vs. 29.9 Gy, p = 0.01) and DL2 (29.3 vs. 30.3 Gy, p = 0.03). MU were reduced by 39.8-49.2% with RapidArc (largest difference at DL3, 641 ± 94 vs. 1261 ± 118, p < 0.01). ¹⁸F-FDG-PET-guided focal dose escalation in oropharyngeal cancer is feasible with RapidArc. Compared with conventional fixed-field IMRT, RapidArc can achieve better dose conformity, improve contralateral parotid sparing, and uses fewer MU.
氟-18-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(¹⁸F-FDG-PET)引导下的口咽癌局部剂量递增可能会潜在地改善局部控制。我们使用容积调强弧形放疗(RapidArc)评估了这种方法的可行性,并将这些计划与固定野调强放疗(IMRT)局部剂量递增计划进行了比较。
对20例患者进行的初步研究使用标准剂量处方将RapidArc与固定野IMRT进行了比较。从该队列中,10例被纳入剂量递增计划研究。将剂量递增应用于原发肿瘤中¹⁸F-FDG-PET阳性区域,剂量水平高于标准根治剂量(30分次给予65 Gy)的5%(DL1)、10%(DL2)和15%(DL3)。为每个数据集生成固定野IMRT和双弧RapidArc计划。使用剂量体积直方图进行计划评估和比较。记录并比较每个计划的帕迪克适形指数(CI(Paddick))和监测单位(MU)。IMRT和RapidArc均产生了临床可接受的计划,并实现了靶区体积的计划目标。RapidArc计划中的剂量适形性明显更好,在原发(PTV1)和选择性(PTV2)计划靶区体积中的CI(Paddick)评分均较低(DL3时PTV1的最大差异;0.81±0.03[RapidArc]对0.77±0.07[IMRT],p = 0.04)。RapidArc和IMRT计划均未超过脊髓和脑干的最大剂量限制,但RapidArc的平均剂量更高(脊髓高2.7±1 Gy,脑干高1.9±1 Gy)。RapidArc的对侧腮腺平均剂量较低,在DL1(29.0对29.9 Gy,p = 0.01)和DL2(29.3对30.3 Gy,p = 0.03)时具有统计学意义。RapidArc使MU减少了39.8 - 49.2%(DL3时差异最大,641±94对1261±118,p < 0.01)。¹⁸F-FDG-PET引导下的口咽癌局部剂量递增在RapidArc中是可行的。与传统的固定野IMRT相比,RapidArc可以实现更好的剂量适形性,改善对侧腮腺的保护,并使用更少的MU。