British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 2012 Oct 1;435-436:21-9. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Jul 28.
Predictive linear regression (LR) modelling between bioaccessible arsenic (B-As) and a range of total elemental compositions and soil properties was executed in order to assess the potential for developing a national B-As dataset for the UK. LR indicates that total arsenic (As) is the only highly significant independent variable for estimating B-As in urban areas where it explains 75-92% of the variance. The broad compatibility of the London, Glasgow and Swansea regression models suggests that application of these models to estimate bioaccessible As in UK soils impacted by diffuse anthropogenic urban contamination and non-ferrous metal processing should be relatively accurate. In areas dominated by Jurassic ironstones and associated clays and limestones, total As, P and pH are significant, accounting for 53, 14 and 5%, respectively, of the B-As variance. Models based on total As as the sole predictor in the combined Jurassic and Cretaceous sedimentary ironstones datasets explain about 40% of the B-As variance. The median As bioaccessible fraction (%As-BAF) is 19 to 28% in the anthropogenic contamination impacted urban domains, but much lower (5-9%) in geogenic terrains dominated by ironstones. Results of this study can be used as part of a lines of evidence approach to localised risk assessment but should not be used to replace bioaccessibility testing at individual sites where local conditions may vary considerably from the broad overview presented in this study.
为了评估英国建立全国生物可利用砷 (B-As) 数据集的潜力,进行了生物可利用砷 (B-As) 与一系列总元素组成和土壤特性之间的预测线性回归 (LR) 建模。LR 表明,总砷 (As) 是估计城市地区 B-As 的唯一高度显著的独立变量,其解释了 75-92%的方差。伦敦、格拉斯哥和斯旺西回归模型的广泛兼容性表明,这些模型应用于估计受弥散人为城市污染和有色金属加工影响的英国土壤中的生物可利用 As 应该相对准确。在以侏罗纪铁矿石和相关粘土和石灰岩为主的地区,总 As、P 和 pH 是重要的,分别占 B-As 方差的 53%、14%和 5%。基于总 As 作为唯一预测因子的模型在侏罗纪和白垩纪沉积铁矿石数据集的组合中解释了约 40%的 B-As 方差。在受人为污染影响的城市域中,砷的生物可利用分数(%As-BAF)为 19%至 28%,但在以铁矿石为主的地质地貌中要低得多(5%-9%)。本研究的结果可作为局部风险评估的证据方法的一部分,但不应替代个别地点的生物可利用性测试,因为个别地点的局部条件可能与本研究中呈现的广泛概述有很大差异。