Suppr超能文献

应用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜评估 DSAEK 界面。

In vivo evaluation of DSAEK interface with scanning-laser confocal microscopy.

机构信息

GB Bietti Eye Foundation, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Ophthalmol. 2012 Aug 1;12:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-12-32.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) allows selective replacement of the endothelium. Post-operative haze and particles can affect the interface quality and, ultimately, visual outcome. In this study, we evaluated DSAEK interface with in vivo laser confocal microscopy (LCM) in order to: (i) correlate interface status with best corrected visual acuity, and (ii) with time from surgery; (iii) correlate interface particle number with best corrected visual acuity. Host-donor interface was imaged and graded using a published reflectivity scale. Particles at the interface were counted.

METHODS

18 eyes of 16 patients (6 males and 10 females); mean age: 74 ± 8.3 years which underwent DSAEK were examined by means of in vivo laser confocal microscopy between 1 and 24 months after surgery. Host-donor interface was imaged and graded using a published reflectivity scale. Particles present at the interface were counted.

RESULTS

Interface reflectivity was 2.17 ± 1.2 and significantly correlated with visual acuity (Spearman correlation coefficient -0.83; P < 0.001), and with time after surgery (Spearman correlation coefficient -0.87; P < 0.001). Visual acuity was 0.67 ± 0.27. The number of particles was 205 ± 117.8; no correlation was found between this number and visual acuity (Spearman correlation coefficient -0.41; P = 0.15).

CONCLUSION

DSAEK interface imaged with LCM is helpful in diagnosing poor host-donor interface quality in DSAEK surgery. A good quality interface is related to a better visual acuity. Moreover, the quality of the interface appears to improve as time passes from the surgery. Interface quality is related with visual acuity and improves with time from surgery. LCM should be considered as an added tool in post-DSAEK follow-up of patients. Finally, our study shows that the presence of particles does not influence visual outcome.

摘要

背景

Descemet 撕囊自动化内皮角膜移植术(DSAEK)允许选择性地替换内皮。术后混浊和颗粒会影响界面质量,并最终影响视力结果。在这项研究中,我们使用活体激光共聚焦显微镜(LCM)评估了 DSAEK 界面,以:(i)将界面状态与最佳矫正视力相关联,(ii)与手术后时间相关联;(iii)将界面颗粒数与最佳矫正视力相关联。使用已发表的反射率量表对供体-宿主界面进行成像和分级。计算界面处的颗粒数。

方法

18 只眼 16 例患者(6 名男性和 10 名女性);平均年龄:74±8.3 岁,在手术后 1 至 24 个月之间通过活体激光共聚焦显微镜检查。使用已发表的反射率量表对供体-宿主界面进行成像和分级。计算界面处的颗粒数。

结果

界面反射率为 2.17±1.2,与视力显著相关(Spearman 相关系数-0.83;P<0.001),并且与手术后时间相关(Spearman 相关系数-0.87;P<0.001)。视力为 0.67±0.27。颗粒数为 205±117.8;该数量与视力之间未发现相关性(Spearman 相关系数-0.41;P=0.15)。

结论

使用 LCM 对 DSAEK 手术中的供体-宿主界面进行成像有助于诊断 DSAEK 手术中较差的供体-宿主界面质量。良好的界面质量与更好的视力相关。此外,随着手术时间的推移,界面质量似乎会提高。界面质量与视力相关,并且与手术后时间相关。LCM 应被视为患者 DSAEK 术后随访的附加工具。最后,我们的研究表明颗粒的存在不会影响视力结果。

相似文献

1
In vivo evaluation of DSAEK interface with scanning-laser confocal microscopy.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2012 Aug 1;12:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-12-32.
2
Tandem scanning confocal microscopy of cornea after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
Eye Contact Lens. 2009 Jul;35(4):196-202. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181abb596.
3
Long-term follow-up of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep;256(9):1669-1677. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-3997-6. Epub 2018 May 8.
5
In vivo laser confocal microscopy after descemet stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jun;145(6):977-985. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.02.009. Epub 2008 Apr 9.
6
In vivo laser confocal microscopy after non-Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jul;116(7):1306-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.053.
7
Confocal microscopy study of donor-recipient interface after Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jul;94(7):903-8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.165712. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
9
[Effect of donor graft characteristics on clinical outcomes in Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)].
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2017 Jan;40(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2016.09.018. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
10
Correlation between visual acuity and interface reflectivity measured by pentacam following DSAEK.
Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;92(1):e1-4. doi: 10.1111/aos.12217. Epub 2013 Jul 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of corneal thickness and haze in DSAEK and penetrating keratoplasty.
Cornea. 2011 Mar;30(3):287-90. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181eeafd6.
2
Laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy in a case of Terrien marginal degeneration.
Cornea. 2010 Apr;29(4):471-5. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181b46aa3.
3
Confocal microscopy study of donor-recipient interface after Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jul;94(7):903-8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.165712. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
4
Failed descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty grafts: a clinicopathologic analysis.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;148(5):752-759.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.06.023. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
5
In vivo laser confocal microscopy after non-Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jul;116(7):1306-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.053.
6
Tandem scanning confocal microscopy of cornea after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
Eye Contact Lens. 2009 Jul;35(4):196-202. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181abb596.
8
A clinicopathologic series of primary graft failure after Descemet's stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty.
Ophthalmology. 2009 Apr;116(4):609-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.036. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
9
Histopathology of posterior lamellar endothelial keratoplasty graft failure.
Cornea. 2008 Sep;27(8):900-4. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318170aeb7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验