Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen UR Livestock Research, PO Box 65, NL-8200 AB Lelystad, the Netherlands.
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Oct;95(10):6103-12. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5280. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
With the aim of increasing the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values for dry matter intake (DMI) in dairy cattle, data from Australia (AU), the United Kingdom (UK), and the Netherlands (NL) were combined using both single-trait and multi-trait models. In total, DMI records were available on 1,801 animals, including 843 AU growing heifers with records on DMI measured over 60 to 70 d at approximately 200 d of age, and 359 UK and 599 NL lactating heifers with records on DMI during the first 100 d in milk. The genotypes used in this study were obtained from the Illumina Bovine 50K chip (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA). The AU, UK, and NL genomic data were matched using the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) name. Quality controls were applied by carefully comparing the genotypes of 40 bulls that were available in each data set. This resulted in 30,949 SNP being used in the analyses. Genomic predictions were estimated with genomic REML, using ASReml software. The accuracy of genomic prediction was evaluated in 11 validation sets; that is, at least 3 validation sets per country were defined. The reference set (in which animals had both DMI phenotypes and genotypes) was either AU or Europe (UK and NL) or a multi-country reference set consisting of all data except the validation set. When DMI for each country was treated as the same trait, use of a multi-country reference set increased the accuracy of genomic prediction for DMI in UK, but not in AU and NL. Extending the model to a bivariate (AU-EU) or trivariate (AU-UK-NL) model increased the accuracy of genomic prediction for DMI in all countries. The highest accuracies were estimated for all countries when data were analyzed with a trivariate model, with increases of up to 5.5% compared with univariate models within countries.
为了提高奶牛干物质采食量(DMI)的基因组估计育种值的准确性,我们结合了来自澳大利亚(AU)、英国(UK)和荷兰(NL)的数据,使用单性状和多性状模型进行分析。共有 1801 头动物的 DMI 记录,包括 843 头 AU 生长小母牛,在大约 200 日龄时,记录了 60 到 70 天的 DMI;359 头 UK 和 599 头 NL 泌乳小母牛在泌乳第 100 天内记录了 DMI。本研究中使用的基因型是从 Illumina Bovine 50K 芯片(Illumina Inc.,San Diego,CA)获得的。通过使用单核苷酸多态性(SNP)名称匹配 AU、UK 和 NL 的基因组数据。通过仔细比较每个数据集都有的 40 头公牛的基因型,进行了质量控制。结果使用了 30949 个 SNP 进行分析。使用 ASReml 软件,通过基因组 REML 估计了基因组预测。在 11 个验证集中评估了基因组预测的准确性;即,每个国家至少定义了 3 个验证集。参考集(动物既有 DMI 表型又有基因型)是 AU 或欧洲(UK 和 NL)或由除验证集之外的所有数据组成的多国家参考集。当将每个国家的 DMI 视为相同性状时,使用多国家参考集增加了 UK 中 DMI 的基因组预测准确性,但在 AU 和 NL 中没有增加。将模型扩展为双变量(AU-EU)或三变量(AU-UK-NL)模型增加了所有国家 DMI 的基因组预测准确性。当使用三变量模型分析数据时,所有国家的估计准确性最高,与国内的单变量模型相比,准确性提高了高达 5.5%。