Lledo-Ferrer Yvan, Peláez Fernando, Heymann Eckhard W
Int J Primatol. 2012 Aug;33(4):762-768. doi: 10.1007/s10764-012-9605-4. Epub 2012 May 24.
Our recent paper Lledo-Ferrer et al. (International Journal of Primatology 32: 974-991, 2011) questioned the classic view of territoriality and chemical communication in wild callitrichids, saddleback tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis). We suggested that rather than defending a territory or resources, chemical communication was more likely to be a way of exchanging reproductive information between groups. Roberts (International Journal of Primatology 33, 2012). challenged this interpretation, considering that the results could more parsimoniously be interpreted as fulfilling a resource defense strategy. This response is intended to clarify some aspects of the debate and to suggest how further research could shed new light on the present polemics.
我们最近的论文《列多 - 费雷尔等人(《国际灵长类学杂志》32: 974 - 991, 2011)》对野生绢毛猴(鞍背绢毛猴,Saguinus fuscicollis)中领地性和化学通讯的传统观点提出了质疑。我们认为,化学通讯更有可能是群体间交换生殖信息的一种方式,而非用于保卫领地或资源。罗伯茨(《国际灵长类学杂志》33, 2012)对这一解释提出了质疑,认为这些结果更简约的解释是符合资源防御策略。本回应旨在澄清辩论的一些方面,并建议进一步的研究如何能为当前的争论带来新的启示。