Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15221, USA.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;33(4):375-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1322401. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
Patients, clinicians and policy makers are increasingly interested in measuring and improving the quality of health care at the end of life. The intensive care unit (ICU) is characterized by high mortality and frequent use of life-sustaining treatments, making critical care a natural target for these efforts. Indeed, multiple local and regional quality improvement efforts now specifically target the dying experience for ICU patients, patients at risk for ICU admission, and their families. These activities either target ICU caregivers through educational programs and quality incentives, or target patients and their families directly through palliative care and efforts to improve decisions around the end of life. Although these initiatives hold great promise, they also face inherent challenges-it is difficult to measure the quality of end-of-life care, we lack practical targets for affecting quality, and uncertain political climates can often preclude serious discussions about end-of-life care. Moreover, these programs may lead to unintended consequences, potentially negatively impacting the very care they seek to improve. Future innovations surrounding how we measure the quality of end-of-life care and paradigm shifts in the way we think about ICU quality may help us to fully realize the goal of improving the dying process for ICU patients.
患者、临床医生和政策制定者越来越关注衡量和改善生命末期的医疗保健质量。重症监护病房(ICU)的特点是死亡率高,经常使用维持生命的治疗方法,因此重症监护成为这些努力的自然目标。事实上,现在有许多地方和区域的质量改进措施专门针对 ICU 患者、有 ICU 入院风险的患者及其家属的临终体验。这些活动要么通过教育计划和质量激励措施针对 ICU 护理人员,要么直接针对患者及其家属,通过姑息治疗和努力改善临终决策。尽管这些举措有很大的前景,但它们也面临着固有的挑战——衡量生命末期护理的质量很困难,我们缺乏影响质量的实际目标,不确定的政治环境往往会排除关于生命末期护理的认真讨论。此外,这些计划可能会带来意想不到的后果,可能会对他们试图改善的护理产生负面影响。未来围绕我们如何衡量生命末期护理质量的创新以及我们对 ICU 质量的思维方式的范式转变,可能有助于我们充分实现改善 ICU 患者临终过程的目标。