Division of Adult Studies, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
J Public Health Dent. 2013 Winter;73(1):79-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2012.00359.x. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
To inform policy with better information about the oral health-care needs of a Medicaid population that engages in employment, that is, people ages 16 to 64 with Social Security-determined disabilities enrolled in a Medicaid Buy-In program.
Statistically test for significant differences among responses to a Medicaid Buy-In program satisfaction survey that included oral health questions from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) to results for the state's general population and the US general population.
All measures of dental care access and oral health were significantly worse for the study population as compared with a state general population or a US general population. Differences were particularly pronounced for the OHIP measure for difficulty doing one's job due to dental problems, which was almost five times higher for the study population.
More comprehensive dental benefits for the study population could result in increased oral and overall health, and eventual cost savings to Medicaid as more people work, have improved health, and pay premiums for coverage.
为政策提供更好的信息,了解参与就业的医疗补助人群(即年龄在 16 至 64 岁之间、有社会保障确定的残疾并参加医疗补助参保计划的人群)的口腔保健需求。
对包括疾病控制与预防中心行为风险因素监测系统和口腔健康影响简表(OHIP)中的口腔健康问题的医疗补助参保计划满意度调查的答复进行统计检验,以了解该州的一般人群和美国一般人群的结果。
与州一般人群或美国一般人群相比,研究人群的所有牙科护理机会和口腔健康衡量标准都明显更差。OHIP 衡量因牙齿问题而影响工作的难度差异尤为显著,研究人群的这一衡量标准几乎高出五倍。
为研究人群提供更全面的牙科福利可能会带来更多的口腔和整体健康,并最终为医疗补助节省成本,因为更多的人工作、健康状况得到改善并为保险支付保费。