Thompson Stephen R, Delaney Geoff P, Gabriel Gabriel S, Jacob Susannah, Barton Michael B
University of Western Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2012 Aug;56(4):483-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2012.02392.x. Epub 2012 May 28.
Having previously modelled the optimal proportion of uterine cervix and corpus cancers that should be treated with brachytherapy (BT), we aimed to complete the assessment of the role of BT for gynaecological cancers by estimating the optimal proportion of vaginal cancer cases that should be treated with BT, the optimal BT utilisation (BTU) rate for vaginal cancer. We compared this with actual vaginal BTU and assessed quality of BT for vaginal cancer by a Patterns-of-Care Study (POCS).
Evidence-based guidelines were used to construct an optimal BTU decision tree for vaginal cancer. Searches of the epidemiological literature to ascertain the proportion of patients who fulfilled the criteria for BT were conducted. The robustness of the model was tested by sensitivity analyses and by peer review. A retrospective POCS of BT in New South Wales (NSW) for 2003 was conducted, and actual BTU for vaginal cancer was determined. Differences between optimal and actual BTU were assessed. Quality of BT for vaginal cancer was compared with published benchmarks.
The optimal vaginal cancer BTU rate was estimated to be 85% (range 81-87%). In NSW in 2003, actual vaginal cancer BTU was only 42% (95% confidence interval 22-62%). In NSW, only nine patients were treated, all with intra-vaginal cylinders, and two of four to lower than recommended doses.
BT for vaginal cancers is underutilised in NSW compared with the proposed optimal models of care. BT quality may have been suboptimal and this may relate to the rarity of this disease.
我们之前已经建立了子宫颈癌和子宫体癌应接受近距离放射治疗(BT)的最佳比例模型,本研究旨在通过估算阴道癌应接受BT治疗的最佳比例以及阴道癌的最佳BT利用率(BTU),完成对BT在妇科癌症中作用的评估。我们将其与实际的阴道BTU进行比较,并通过护理模式研究(POCS)评估阴道癌BT的质量。
采用循证指南构建阴道癌最佳BTU决策树。检索流行病学文献以确定符合BT标准的患者比例。通过敏感性分析和同行评审对模型的稳健性进行测试。对新南威尔士州(NSW)2003年BT进行回顾性POCS,并确定阴道癌的实际BTU。评估最佳和实际BTU之间的差异。将阴道癌BT的质量与已发表的基准进行比较。
估计阴道癌的最佳BTU率为85%(范围81 - 87%)。2003年在新南威尔士州,阴道癌的实际BTU仅为42%(95%置信区间22 - 62%)。在新南威尔士州,仅9例患者接受了治疗,均使用阴道柱状施源器,其中4例中有2例接受的剂量低于推荐剂量。
与建议的最佳护理模式相比,新南威尔士州阴道癌的BT使用不足。BT质量可能未达到最佳,这可能与该疾病的罕见性有关。