Nestlé Research Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2012 Nov;64(2):315-23. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.07.009. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
Scientific criteria for identifying allergenic foods of public health importance (Björkstén, B., Crevel, R., Hischenhuber, C., Løvik, M., Samuels, F., Strobel, S., Taylor, S.L., Wal, J.-M., Ward, R., 2008. Criteria for identifying allergenic foods of public health importance. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 51(1), 42-52) have been further refined to incorporate an assessment of the strength of available scientific evidence (van Bilsen, J.H., Ronsmans, S., Crevel, R.W., Rona, R.J., Przyrembel, H., Penninks, A.H., Contor, L., Houben, G.F., 2011. Evaluation of scientific criteria for identifying allergenic food of public health importance. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 60, 281-289). A multi-disciplinary group was invited to critically test the refined approach. They independently evaluated selected publications on coconut, soy and/or peanut allergy, scored them using the newly developed level of evidence criteria, and debated proposed approaches for combining and utilising the scores to measure the overall impact of an allergen in public health impact assessments. The evaluation of selected publications using the modified criteria produced a relatively consistent result across the experts. These refined criteria were judged to be a way forward for the identification of allergenic foods of public health importance, and for prioritisation of allergen risk management and future data gathering. The debate to combine available evidence when assessing whether an allergenic food is of sufficient public health importance to warrant active management led to proposals on how to weight and combine evidence on allergen severity, potency and prevalence. The refined criteria facilitate a debate to find a meaningful sequence of steps to summarise the available information in relation to a food allergen.
已进一步完善识别具有公共卫生重要性的变应原性食物的科学标准(Björkstén、B.、Crevel、R.、Hischenhuber、C.、Løvik、M.、Samuels、F.、Strobel、S.、Taylor、S.L.、Wal、J.-M.、Ward、R.,2008. 识别具有公共卫生重要性的变应原性食物的标准。监管毒理学与药理学 51(1),42-52),以纳入对现有科学证据强度的评估(van Bilsen、J.H.、Ronsmans、S.、Crevel、R.W.、Rona、R.J.、Przyrembel、H.、Penninks、A.H.、Contor、L.、Houben、G.F.,2011. 评估识别具有公共卫生重要性的变应原性食物的科学标准。监管毒理学与药理学 60,281-289)。邀请了一个多学科小组对经过改进的方法进行严格测试。他们独立评估了关于椰子、大豆和/或花生过敏的选定出版物,使用新开发的证据标准对其进行评分,并就组合和利用评分来衡量过敏原对公共卫生影响评估的总体影响的拟议方法进行了辩论。使用修改后的标准对选定出版物进行评估,专家们的评估结果相对一致。专家组认为,这些经过改进的标准是识别具有公共卫生重要性的变应原性食物以及对过敏原风险管理和未来数据收集进行优先排序的一种方法。在评估一种变应原性食物是否具有足够的公共卫生重要性以进行积极管理时,关于结合现有证据的辩论导致了关于如何权衡和组合过敏原严重性、效力和流行率证据的建议。这些经过改进的标准有助于进行辩论,以找到一种有意义的步骤序列,总结与食物过敏原相关的可用信息。