Suppr超能文献

在间歇性最大乳酸稳态下的疲劳时间长于连续循环运动。

Time to exhaustion at intermittent maximal lactate steady state is longer than continuous cycling exercise.

机构信息

Sports Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.

出版信息

Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012 Dec;37(6):1047-53. doi: 10.1139/h2012-088. Epub 2012 Aug 15.

Abstract

The maximal lactate steady state (MLSS) represents a submaximal intensity that may be important in prescribing both continuous and interval endurance training. This study compared time to exhaustion (TTE) at MLSS in continuous and intermittent (i.e., with pauses) exercise, investigating whether physiological variables differ between these exercise modes. Fourteen trained male cyclists volunteered for this investigation and performed an incremental test, several 30-min tests to determine two MLSS intensities (continuous and discontinuous protocol), and two randomized tests until exhaustion at MLSS intensities on a cycle ergometer. The intermittent or discontinuous protocol was performed using 5 min of cycling, with an interval of 1 min of passive rest. TTE at intermittent MLSS was 24% longer than TTE at continuous exercise (67.8 ± 14.3 min vs. 54.7 ± 10.9 min; p < 0.05; effect sizes = 1.04), even though the absolute power output of intermittent MLSS was higher than continuous (268 ± 29 W vs. 251 ± 29 W; p < 0.05). Additionally, the total mechanical work done was significantly lower at continuous exercise than at intermittent exercise. Likewise, regarding cardiorespiratory and metabolic variables, we observed greater responses during intermittent exercise than during continuous exercise at MLSS. Thus, for endurance training prescription, this is an important finding to apply in extensive interval sessions at MLSS. This result suggests that interval sessions at discontinuous MLSS should be used instead of continuous MLSS, as discontinuous MLSS allows for a larger amount of total work during the exhaustion trial.

摘要

最大乳酸稳态 (MLSS) 代表一种亚最大强度,对于规定连续和间歇耐力训练可能很重要。本研究比较了在连续和间歇(即有休息时间)运动中达到 MLSS 的疲劳时间 (TTE),研究了这些运动模式之间的生理变量是否存在差异。14 名受过训练的男性自行车手自愿参加了这项研究,并进行了递增测试、几次 30 分钟的测试以确定两种 MLSS 强度(连续和不连续方案),以及在自行车测力计上以 MLSS 强度进行两次随机测试直至疲劳。间歇或不连续方案使用 5 分钟的骑行,间隔 1 分钟的被动休息。间歇 MLSS 的 TTE 比连续运动长 24%(67.8 ± 14.3 min 比 54.7 ± 10.9 min;p < 0.05;效应大小= 1.04),尽管间歇 MLSS 的绝对功率输出高于连续(268 ± 29 W 比 251 ± 29 W;p < 0.05)。此外,连续运动时完成的总机械功明显低于间歇运动时。同样,关于心肺和代谢变量,我们观察到在 MLSS 时,间歇运动比连续运动时的反应更大。因此,对于耐力训练处方,这是一个重要的发现,适用于在 MLSS 进行广泛的间歇训练。该结果表明,在不连续 MLSS 进行间歇训练应代替连续 MLSS,因为在不连续 MLSS 中,在疲劳试验期间可以完成更大的总工作量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验