Suppr超能文献

精神分裂症患者伴幻听时听觉驱动是否会降低γ频段脑电同步?

Is gamma band EEG synchronization reduced during auditory driving in schizophrenia patients with auditory verbal hallucinations?

机构信息

Department of Psychiatric Neurophysiology, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Schizophr Res. 2012 Nov;141(2-3):266-70. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.07.016. Epub 2012 Aug 12.

Abstract

Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) in schizophrenia patients assumingly result from a state inadequate activation of the primary auditory system. We tested brain responsiveness to auditory stimulation in healthy controls (n=26), and in schizophrenia patients that frequently (n=18) or never (n=11) experienced AVH. Responsiveness was assessed by driving the EEG with click-tones at 20, 30 and 40Hz. We compared stimulus induced EEG changes between groups using spectral amplitude maps and a global measure of phase-locking (GFS). As expected, the 40Hz stimulation elicited the strongest changes. However, while controls and non-hallucinators increased 40Hz EEG activity during stimulation, a left-lateralized decrease was observed in the hallucinators. These differences were significant (p=.02). As expected, GFS increased during stimulation in controls (p=.08) and non-hallucinating patients (p=.06), which was significant when combining the two groups (p=.01). In contrast, GFS decreased with stimulation in hallucinating patients (p=0.13), resulting in a significantly different GFS response when comparing subjects with and without AVH (p<.01). Our data suggests that normally, 40Hz stimulation leads to the activation of a synchronized network representing the sensory input, but in hallucinating patients, the same stimulation partly disrupts ongoing activity in this network.

摘要

精神分裂症患者的听觉言语幻觉(AVH)据称是由于初级听觉系统的激活状态不足所致。我们测试了健康对照组(n=26)和经常(n=18)或从不(n=11)经历 AVH 的精神分裂症患者对听觉刺激的大脑反应。通过以 20、30 和 40Hz 的点击音驱动 EEG 来评估反应性。我们使用频谱幅度图和相位锁定的全局度量(GFS)比较了组间刺激诱导的 EEG 变化。正如预期的那样,40Hz 刺激引起了最强的变化。然而,虽然对照组和非幻听者在刺激期间增加了 40Hz EEG 活动,但幻听者观察到左侧的减少。这些差异具有统计学意义(p=.02)。正如预期的那样,GFS 在对照组(p=.08)和非幻听患者(p=.06)中随着刺激而增加,当将两组结合起来时,这具有统计学意义(p=.01)。相比之下,GFS 在幻听者中随着刺激而降低(p=0.13),导致有和没有 AVH 的受试者之间的 GFS 反应明显不同(p<.01)。我们的数据表明,正常情况下,40Hz 刺激会导致代表感觉输入的同步网络的激活,但在幻听者中,相同的刺激会部分破坏该网络中的进行中的活动。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验