• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对受到压缩限制的音乐进行质量和响度判断。

Quality and loudness judgments for music subjected to compression limiting.

机构信息

Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):1177-88. doi: 10.1121/1.4730881.

DOI:10.1121/1.4730881
PMID:22894236
Abstract

Dynamic-range compression (DRC) is used in the music industry to maximize loudness. The amount of compression applied to commercial recordings has increased over time due to a motivating perspective that louder music is always preferred. In contrast to this viewpoint, artists and consumers have argued that using large amounts of DRC negatively affects the quality of music. However, little research evidence has supported the claims of either position. The present study investigated how DRC affects the perceived loudness and sound quality of recorded music. Rock and classical music samples were peak-normalized and then processed using different amounts of DRC. Normal-hearing listeners rated the processed and unprocessed samples on overall loudness, dynamic range, pleasantness, and preference, using a scaled paired-comparison procedure in two conditions: un-equalized, in which the loudness of the music samples varied, and loudness-equalized, in which loudness differences were minimized. Results indicated that a small amount of compression was preferred in the un-equalized condition, but the highest levels of compression were generally detrimental to quality, whether loudness was equalized or varied. These findings are contrary to the "louder is better" mentality in the music industry and suggest that more conservative use of DRC may be preferred for commercial music.

摘要

动态范围压缩(DRC)在音乐行业中用于最大化响度。由于一种激励性的观点认为更响亮的音乐总是更受欢迎,因此商业录音中应用的压缩量随着时间的推移而增加。与这种观点相反,艺术家和消费者认为大量使用 DRC 会降低音乐质量。然而,很少有研究证据支持这两种观点的主张。本研究探讨了 DRC 如何影响录制音乐的感知响度和声音质量。摇滚和古典音乐样本被峰值归一化,然后使用不同量的 DRC 进行处理。正常听力的听众使用比例配对比较程序在两种条件下对处理过和未处理过的样本进行整体响度、动态范围、愉悦度和偏好度的评分:未均衡,其中音乐样本的响度不同;和响度均衡,其中最大限度地减少了响度差异。结果表明,在未均衡条件下,少量压缩更受欢迎,但无论响度是否均衡或变化,最高水平的压缩通常都不利于质量。这些发现与音乐行业中的“更响亮更好”的心态相反,表明商业音乐可能更倾向于更保守地使用 DRC。

相似文献

1
Quality and loudness judgments for music subjected to compression limiting.对受到压缩限制的音乐进行质量和响度判断。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):1177-88. doi: 10.1121/1.4730881.
2
Dynamic Range Across Music Genres and the Perception of Dynamic Compression in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.跨音乐流派的动态范围以及听力受损听众对动态压缩的感知
Trends Hear. 2016 Feb 10;20:2331216516630549. doi: 10.1177/2331216516630549.
3
Music preferences with hearing aids: effects of signal properties, compression settings, and listener characteristics.使用助听器时的音乐偏好:信号特性、压缩设置和聆听者特征的影响
Ear Hear. 2014 Sep-Oct;35(5):e170-84. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000056.
4
Preferred delay and phase-frequency response of open-canal hearing aids with music at low insertion gain.低增益插入时开放式助听器音乐的首选延迟和相位频率响应。
Int J Audiol. 2012 Dec;51(12):906-13. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.701020. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
5
What makes a melody: The perceptual singularity of pitch sequences.旋律的本质:音高序列的感知奇点。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Dec;126(6):3179-87. doi: 10.1121/1.3257206.
6
Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.12名成年Nucleus 24型人工耳蜗植入者的神经反应遥测阈值、T级和C级与响度判断之间的关系。
Ear Hear. 2007 Aug;28(4):495-511. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31806dc16e.
7
Loudness change in response to dynamic acoustic intensity.对动态声强的响度变化响应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1631-44. doi: 10.1037/a0018389.
8
Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.慢作用宽动态范围压缩对模拟听力损失听众的言语清晰度测量及言语质量评分的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Jun;48(3):702-14. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/048).
9
Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived music quality.噪声、非线性处理和线性滤波对感知音乐质量的影响。
Int J Audiol. 2011 Mar;50(3):177-90. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.539273.
10
Impact of frequency compression on music perception.频率压缩对音乐感知的影响。
Int J Audiol. 2015;54(9):627-33. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1020972. Epub 2015 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors in the Effective Use of Hearing Aids among Subjects with Age-Related Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.老年听力损失患者有效使用助听器的相关因素:一项系统综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 10;13(14):4027. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144027.
2
Effect of Digital Noise Reduction of Hearing Aids on Music and Speech Perception.助听器数字降噪对音乐和言语感知的影响。
J Audiol Otol. 2020 Oct;24(4):180-190. doi: 10.7874/jao.2020.00031. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
3
Music Participation Among School-Aged Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.听力障碍学龄儿童的音乐参与情况
Am J Audiol. 2019 Dec 16;28(4):908-926. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJA-19-0058. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
4
Dynamic Range Across Music Genres and the Perception of Dynamic Compression in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.跨音乐流派的动态范围以及听力受损听众对动态压缩的感知
Trends Hear. 2016 Feb 10;20:2331216516630549. doi: 10.1177/2331216516630549.
5
The Dynamic Range for Korean Standard Sentence Material: A Gender Comparison in a Male and a Female Speakers.
J Audiol Otol. 2015 Sep;19(2):97-100. doi: 10.7874/jao.2015.19.2.97. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
6
Music and hearing aids.音乐与助听器。
Trends Hear. 2014 Oct 31;18:2331216514558271. doi: 10.1177/2331216514558271.
7
Analog-to-digital conversion to accommodate the dynamics of live music in hearing instruments.模数转换以适应助听器中现场音乐的动态变化。
Trends Amplif. 2012 Sep;16(3):146-58. doi: 10.1177/1084713812471906.