Suppr超能文献

随着鹅、鹿和牛的动物粪便进入河床沉积物中的大肠杆菌的持久性。

Persistence of Escherichia coli introduced into streambed sediments with goose, deer and bovine animal waste.

作者信息

Kiefer L A, Shelton D R, Pachepsky Y, Blaustein R, Santin-Duran M

机构信息

BlueWave Microbics, LLC, Columbia, MD, USA USDA-ARS, Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, Beltsville, MD, USA.

出版信息

Lett Appl Microbiol. 2012 Nov;55(5):345-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2012.03296.x. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

Abstract

AIMS

The focus of this work was to compare the survival of Escherichia coli introduced into streambed sediments from goose, deer and bovine faeces vs indigenous E. coli.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The survival experiments were conducted in flow-through chambers for 32days using two sediments (mineral and organic) obtained from a first-order creek in Maryland. Bovine, goose and deer faeces were collected fresh and diluted or enriched so that added E. coli and indigenous populations were equivalent. Escherichia coli and total coliforms were enumerated using the Colilert-18 Quanti-Tray system. Patterns of E. coli survival and inactivation rates were virtually identical for indigenous strains in both mineral and organic sediments. The addition of E. coli strains from bovine, goose or deer faeces had relatively little impact on final E. coli concentrations, with the exception of deer-borne E. coli populations in the organic sediment.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that indigenous sediment-borne E. coli strains are generally, or more, persistent than those deposited into sediments, including wildlife.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

This is the first study on the survival of E. coli originating from wildlife faeces, in sediments, as opposed to bovine faeces or laboratory-cultured strains. As wildlife are likely to be the primary source of E. coli in most non agricultural watersheds, an understanding of the persistence of these strains is important to understanding microbial water quality.

摘要

目的

本研究的重点是比较源自鹅、鹿和牛粪便的大肠杆菌引入河床沉积物后的存活率与本地大肠杆菌的存活率。

方法与结果

利用从马里兰州一条一级溪流中获取的两种沉积物(矿物质和有机沉积物),在流通室中进行了为期32天的存活实验。新鲜采集牛、鹅和鹿的粪便并进行稀释或富集,以使添加的大肠杆菌和本地菌群数量相当。使用Colilert-18定量盘系统对大肠杆菌和总大肠菌群进行计数。在矿物质和有机沉积物中,本地菌株的大肠杆菌存活模式和失活率几乎相同。除了有机沉积物中源自鹿的大肠杆菌菌群外,添加来自牛、鹅或鹿粪便的大肠杆菌菌株对最终大肠杆菌浓度的影响相对较小。

结论

这些结果表明,沉积物中本地的大肠杆菌菌株通常比包括野生动物粪便在内的沉积到沉积物中的大肠杆菌菌株更持久,甚至更持久。

研究的意义和影响

这是第一项关于源自野生动物粪便而非牛粪便或实验室培养菌株的大肠杆菌在沉积物中存活情况的研究。由于在大多数非农业流域中,野生动物可能是大肠杆菌的主要来源,了解这些菌株的持久性对于理解微生物水质很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验