Suppr超能文献

自动化容积调强弧形治疗计划在 III 期肺癌中的应用:与调强放疗相比如何?

Automated volumetric modulated Arc therapy treatment planning for stage III lung cancer: how does it compare with intensity-modulated radio therapy?

机构信息

Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Sep 1;84(1):e69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.02.017.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the quality of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans generated by an automated inverse planning system with that of dosimetrist-generated IMRT treatment plans for patients with stage III lung cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two groups of 8 patients with stage III lung cancer were randomly selected. For group 1, the dosimetrists spent their best effort in designing IMRT plans to compete with the automated inverse planning system (mdaccAutoPlan); for group 2, the dosimetrists were not in competition and spent their regular effort. Five experienced radiation oncologists independently blind-reviewed and ranked the three plans for each patient: a rank of 1 was the best and 3 was the worst. Dosimetric measures were also performed to quantitatively evaluate the three types of plans.

RESULTS

Blind rankings from different oncologists were generally consistent. For group 1, the auto-VMAT, auto-IMRT, and manual IMRT plans received average ranks of 1.6, 2.13, and 2.18, respectively. The auto-VMAT plans in group 1 had 10% higher planning tumor volume (PTV) conformality and 24% lower esophagus V70 (the volume receiving 70 Gy or more) than the manual IMRT plans; they also resulted in more than 20% higher complication-free tumor control probability (P+) than either type of IMRT plans. The auto- and manual IMRT plans in this group yielded generally comparable dosimetric measures. For group 2, the auto-VMAT, auto-IMRT, and manual IMRT plans received average ranks of 1.55, 1.75, and 2.75, respectively. Compared to the manual IMRT plans in this group, the auto-VMAT plans and auto-IMRT plans showed, respectively, 17% and 14% higher PTV dose conformality, 8% and 17% lower mean lung dose, 17% and 26% lower mean heart dose, and 36% and 23% higher P+.

CONCLUSIONS

mdaccAutoPlan is capable of generating high-quality VMAT and IMRT treatment plans for stage III lung cancer. Manual IMRT plans could achieve quality similar to auto-IMRT plans if best effort was spent.

摘要

目的

比较由自动逆向计划系统生成的容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)或调强放射治疗(IMRT)计划与治疗Ⅲ期肺癌患者的剂量师生成的 IMRT 治疗计划的质量。

方法和材料

随机选择两组 8 例Ⅲ期肺癌患者。对于第 1 组,剂量师尽最大努力设计 IMRT 计划以与自动逆向计划系统(mdaccAutoPlan)竞争;对于第 2 组,剂量师没有竞争,只花费正常的努力。5 位有经验的放射肿瘤学家独立对每位患者的三种计划进行盲法评估和排名:1 分是最好的,3 分是最差的。还进行了剂量学测量以定量评估三种类型的计划。

结果

不同肿瘤学家的盲法排名通常是一致的。对于第 1 组,自动-VMAT、自动-IMRT 和手动 IMRT 计划的平均排名分别为 1.6、2.13 和 2.18。第 1 组的自动-VMAT 计划比手动 IMRT 计划有 10%更高的计划肿瘤体积(PTV)适形性和 24%更低的食管 V70(接受 70 Gy 或更高剂量的体积);它们还使无并发症肿瘤控制概率(P+)比任何一种 IMRT 计划高出 20%以上。该组的自动和手动 IMRT 计划产生的剂量学测量结果通常相似。对于第 2 组,自动-VMAT、自动-IMRT 和手动 IMRT 计划的平均排名分别为 1.55、1.75 和 2.75。与该组的手动 IMRT 计划相比,自动-VMAT 计划和自动-IMRT 计划分别显示 PTV 剂量适形性提高了 17%和 14%,平均肺剂量降低了 8%和 17%,平均心脏剂量降低了 17%和 26%,P+提高了 36%和 23%。

结论

mdaccAutoPlan 能够为Ⅲ期肺癌生成高质量的 VMAT 和 IMRT 治疗计划。如果付出最大努力,手动 IMRT 计划可以达到与自动-IMRT 计划相似的质量。

相似文献

2
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct 7;18(37):5266-75. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i37.5266.
3
Volumetric arc intensity-modulated therapy for spine body radiotherapy: comparison with static intensity-modulated treatment.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Dec 1;75(5):1596-604. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 Sep 3.
4
Fully automated VMAT treatment planning for advanced-stage NSCLC patients.
Strahlenther Onkol. 2017 May;193(5):402-409. doi: 10.1007/s00066-017-1121-1. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
10
Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic malignancies.
Med Dosim. 2012 Autumn;37(3):271-5. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of photon intensity modulated, hybrid and volumetric modulated arc radiation treatment techniques in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2023 Nov 18;28:100519. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100519. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Automated treatment planning for liver cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Clin Transl Oncol. 2023 Nov;25(11):3230-3240. doi: 10.1007/s12094-023-03196-4. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
3
Evaluation of auto-planning in VMAT for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 9;12(1):4167. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07519-3.
4
Comparison of combinations of irradiation techniques and jaw conditions in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for lung cancer.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Oct;22(10):178-189. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13416. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
5
Utilisation of Pareto navigation techniques to calibrate a fully automated radiotherapy treatment planning solution.
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019 May 16;10:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2019.04.005. eCollection 2019 Apr.
8
Influence of maximum MLC leaf speed on the quality of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Nov;21(11):37-47. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13020. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
10
Automatic Planning for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on Progressive Optimization in RayStation Treatment Planning System.
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1533033820915710. doi: 10.1177/1533033820915710.

本文引用的文献

1
A comprehensive comparison of IMRT and VMAT plan quality for prostate cancer treatment.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jul 15;83(4):1169-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.09.015.
2
A methodology for automatic intensity-modulated radiation treatment planning for lung cancer.
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Jul 7;56(13):3873-93. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/13/009. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
3
Data-driven approach to generating achievable dose-volume histogram objectives in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Mar 15;79(4):1241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.026. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
6
Clinical applications of volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jun 1;77(2):608-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.032. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
7
Radiotherapy treatment plans with RapidArc for prostate cancer involving seminal vesicles and lymph nodes.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3):935-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1677. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
8
Volumetric modulated Arc therapy (VMAT) treatment planning for superficial tumors.
Med Dosim. 2010 Autumn;35(3):226-9. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2009.06.006. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
10
Volumetric arc intensity-modulated therapy for spine body radiotherapy: comparison with static intensity-modulated treatment.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Dec 1;75(5):1596-604. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 Sep 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验