Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Liver Transpl. 2012 Dec;18(12):1448-55. doi: 10.1002/lt.23540.
It is believed that antiviral prophylaxis decreases the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and disease. There are few data regarding weekly assays for CMV DNA after transplantation and the subsequent management of CMV. Here we report a cohort of living related liver transplantation (LRLT) patients who were treated for invasive CMV disease or for CMV infections if they were receiving steroids for rejection. Patients who underwent liver transplantation at our center between September 2006 and August 2010 and were recipient-positive/donor-positive (R(+) /D(+) ) were prospectively included. Patients were tested for CMV DNA 3 weeks after transplantation. CMV DNA-positive patients underwent weekly DNA monitoring until there were 2 consecutive negative reports. Those who developed CMV disease or had rising DNA titers while they were on treatment for rejection were treated. A Cox regression analysis was performed for factors predicting survival. Two hundred sixty-six of the 306 R(+) /D(+) patients were CMV DNA-negative 3 weeks after transplantation, and 40 had detectable DNA. One of the DNA-negative patients developed CMV disease after treatment for rejection with methylprednisolone. Thirty patients had <500 copies/mL, and 10 had ≥500 copies/mL. Two of the 30 patients with DNA levels < 500 copies/mL developed CMV disease. Six of the 10 patients with DNA levels ≥500 copies/mL developed disease. CMV disease occurred in 9 of the 306 patients (2.9%). One patient received treatment for a rise in DNA titers while he was receiving steroids. There was a significant correlation between steroid administration for acute cellular rejection (ACR) and CMV reactivation (P = 0.003) and disease (P = 0.002). A multivariate analysis showed that CMV reactivation/disease did not predict survival. There was no difference in survival between CMV DNA-positive patients and CMV DNA-negative patients (P = 0.68). In conclusion, CMV reactivation is common after LRLT (13%), but the disease is rare (2.9%) without prophylaxis in CMV immunoglobulin G-positive recipients. The administration of steroids for ACR strongly correlates with CMV reactivation and disease. CMV reactivation and disease did not affect survival in our patient cohort.
据信,抗病毒预防可降低巨细胞病毒 (CMV) 再激活和疾病的发生率。关于移植后每周进行 CMV DNA 检测以及随后的 CMV 管理,数据较少。这里我们报告了一组接受活体相关肝移植 (LRLT) 的患者,如果因排斥反应而接受类固醇治疗,则会治疗侵袭性 CMV 疾病或 CMV 感染。我们中心于 2006 年 9 月至 2010 年 8 月期间进行肝移植的患者,并且受体阳性/供体阳性 (R(+) /D(+) ),均为前瞻性纳入。患者在移植后 3 周接受 CMV DNA 检测。CMV DNA 阳性患者每周进行 DNA 监测,直到连续两次阴性报告。那些在接受排斥反应治疗时发生 CMV 疾病或 DNA 滴度升高的患者将接受治疗。对预测生存率的因素进行 Cox 回归分析。在 3 周后移植时,306 例 R(+) /D(+) 患者中 266 例为 CMV DNA 阴性,40 例为可检测 DNA。一名 DNA 阴性患者在接受甲基强的松龙治疗排斥反应后发生 CMV 疾病。30 例患者的 DNA 水平 <500 拷贝/ml,10 例患者的 DNA 水平≥500 拷贝/ml。在 30 例 DNA 水平 <500 拷贝/ml 的患者中,有 2 例发生 CMV 疾病。在 10 例 DNA 水平≥500 拷贝/ml 的患者中,有 6 例发生疾病。306 例患者中有 9 例(2.9%)发生 CMV 疾病。1 例患者在接受类固醇治疗时 DNA 滴度升高。急性细胞性排斥反应 (ACR) 的类固醇治疗与 CMV 再激活 (P=0.003) 和疾病 (P=0.002) 之间存在显著相关性。多变量分析显示,CMV 再激活/疾病不预测生存率。CMV DNA 阳性患者与 CMV DNA 阴性患者的生存率无差异(P=0.68)。总之,LRLT 后 CMV 再激活很常见(13%),但在 CMV IgG 阳性受者中未进行预防时,疾病很少见(2.9%)。ACR 类固醇治疗与 CMV 再激活和疾病密切相关。CMV 再激活和疾病未影响我们患者队列的生存率。