Notelaers Kristof, Smisdom Nick, Rocha Susana, Janssen Daniel, Meier Jochen C, Rigo Jean-Michel, Hofkens Johan, Ameloot Marcel
Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University and School of Life Sciences, Transnational University Limburg, Agoralaan gebouw C, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Dec;1818(12):3131-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.08.010. Epub 2012 Aug 18.
The spatio-temporal membrane behavior of glycine receptors (GlyRs) is known to be of influence on receptor homeostasis and functionality. In this work, an elaborate fluorimetric strategy was applied to study the GlyR α3K and L isoforms. Previously established differential clustering, desensitization and synaptic localization of these isoforms imply that membrane behavior is crucial in determining GlyR α3 physiology. Therefore diffusion and aggregation of homomeric α3 isoform-containing GlyRs were studied in HEK 293 cells. A unique combination of multiple diffraction-limited ensemble average methods and subdiffraction single particle techniques was used in order to achieve an integrated view of receptor properties. Static measurements of aggregation were performed with image correlation spectroscopy (ICS) and, single particle based, direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM). Receptor diffusion was measured by means of raster image correlation spectroscopy (RICS), temporal image correlation spectroscopy (TICS), fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and single particle tracking (SPT). The results show a significant difference in diffusion coefficient and cluster size between the isoforms. This reveals a positive correlation between desensitization and diffusion and disproves the notion that receptor aggregation is a universal mechanism for accelerated desensitization. The difference in diffusion coefficient between the clustering GlyR α3L and the non-clustering GlyR α3K cannot be explained by normal diffusion. SPT measurements indicate that the α3L receptors undergo transient trapping and directed motion, while the GlyR α3K displays mild hindered diffusion. These findings are suggestive of differential molecular interaction of the isoforms after incorporation in the membrane.
已知甘氨酸受体(GlyRs)的时空膜行为会影响受体的稳态和功能。在这项研究中,我们应用了一种精细的荧光策略来研究GlyR α3K和L亚型。此前已确定的这些亚型的差异聚类、脱敏和突触定位表明,膜行为对于确定GlyR α3的生理学特性至关重要。因此,我们在HEK 293细胞中研究了含同源α3亚型的GlyRs的扩散和聚集情况。我们使用了多种衍射极限系综平均方法和亚衍射单粒子技术的独特组合,以全面了解受体特性。我们用图像相关光谱法(ICS)和基于单粒子的直接随机光学重建显微镜(dSTORM)对聚集进行了静态测量。我们通过光栅图像相关光谱法(RICS)、时间图像相关光谱法(TICS)、光漂白后荧光恢复(FRAP)和单粒子追踪(SPT)来测量受体扩散。结果显示,各亚型之间的扩散系数和簇大小存在显著差异。这揭示了脱敏与扩散之间的正相关关系,并反驳了受体聚集是加速脱敏的普遍机制这一观点。聚类的GlyR α3L和非聚类的GlyR α3K之间的扩散系数差异无法用正常扩散来解释。SPT测量表明,α3L受体经历瞬时捕获和定向运动,而GlyR α3K表现出轻度的扩散受阻。这些发现表明,各亚型在整合到膜中后存在不同的分子相互作用。