Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041025. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
Several acoustic cues contribute to auditory distance estimation. Nonacoustic cues, including familiarity, may also play a role. We tested participants' ability to distinguish the distances of acoustically similar sounds that differed in familiarity. Participants were better able to judge the distances of familiar sounds. Electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings collected while participants performed this auditory distance judgment task revealed that several cortical regions responded in different ways depending on sound familiarity. Surprisingly, these differences were observed in auditory cortical regions as well as other cortical regions distributed throughout both hemispheres. These data suggest that learning about subtle, distance-dependent variations in complex speech sounds involves processing in a broad cortical network that contributes both to speech recognition and to how spatial information is extracted from speech.
几个听觉线索有助于听觉距离估计。非听觉线索,包括熟悉度,也可能起作用。我们测试了参与者区分声音熟悉度不同但听觉相似的声音的距离的能力。参与者能够更好地判断熟悉声音的距离。参与者在执行此听觉距离判断任务时记录的脑电图 (EEG) 显示,几个皮质区域根据声音的熟悉程度以不同的方式做出反应。令人惊讶的是,这些差异不仅在听觉皮质区域中观察到,而且在分布于两个半球的其他皮质区域中也观察到。这些数据表明,学习复杂语音声音中微妙的、依赖距离的变化涉及到广泛的皮质网络的处理,这些处理既有助于语音识别,也有助于从语音中提取空间信息。