Suppr超能文献

创伤后应激症状在两次火灾暴露后的表现:对比研究。

Posttraumatic stress symptoms after exposure to two fire disasters: comparative study.

机构信息

Department of Psychosocial and Behavioural Research, Association of Dutch Burns Centres, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041532. Epub 2012 Jul 24.

Abstract

This study investigated traumatic stress symptoms in severely burned survivors of two fire disasters and two comparison groups of patients with "non-disaster" burn injuries, as well as risk factors associated with acute and chronic stress symptoms. Patients were admitted to one out of eight burn centers in The Netherlands or Belgium. The Impact of Event Scale (IES) was administered to 61 and 33 survivors respectively of two fire disasters and 54 and 57 patients with "non-disaster" burn etiologies at 2 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the event. We used latent growth modeling (LGM) analyses to investigate the stress trajectories and predictors in the two disaster and two comparison groups. The results showed that initial traumatic stress reactions in disaster survivors with severe burns are more intense and prolonged during several months relative to survivors of "non-disaster" burn injuries. Excluding the industrial fire group, all participants' symptoms on average decreased over the two year period. Burn severity, peritraumatic anxiety and dissociation predicted the long-term negative outcomes only in the industrial fire group. In conclusion, fire disaster survivors appear to experience higher levels of traumatic stress symptoms on the short term, but the long-term outcome appears dependent on factors different from the first response. Likely, the younger age, and several beneficial post-disaster factors such as psychosocial aftercare and social support, along with swift judicial procedures, contributed to the positive outcome in one disaster cohort.

摘要

本研究调查了两起火灾中严重烧伤幸存者以及两组“非灾难”烧伤患者的创伤后应激症状,以及与急性和慢性应激症状相关的风险因素。患者被收入荷兰或比利时的 8 家烧伤中心之一。事件发生后 2 周、3 个月、6 个月、12 个月和 24 个月,分别对两起火灾中的 61 名和 33 名幸存者以及两组“非灾难”烧伤病因的 54 名和 57 名患者使用事件影响量表(IES)进行了评估。我们使用潜在增长模型(LGM)分析来研究两组灾难幸存者和两组对照组的应激轨迹和预测因素。结果表明,与“非灾难”烧伤幸存者相比,严重烧伤的灾难幸存者在几个月内初始创伤性应激反应更为强烈和持久。排除工业火灾组后,所有参与者的症状在两年期间平均呈下降趋势。烧伤严重程度、创伤前焦虑和分离预测仅在工业火灾组中与长期负面结果相关。总之,火灾幸存者在短期内似乎经历了更高水平的创伤后应激症状,但长期结果似乎取决于与最初反应不同的因素。可能是年轻的年龄,以及一些有益的灾后因素,如心理社会康复和社会支持,以及迅速的司法程序,促成了一个灾难队列的积极结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16be/3404048/8bbbcd1c692c/pone.0041532.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Posttraumatic stress symptoms after exposure to two fire disasters: comparative study.
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041532. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
2
Long-term mental health outcomes of severe burn injury: A 5-year follow-up of the 2015 Formosa Fun Coast Water Park fire disaster.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2022 Mar-Apr;75:10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2022.01.007. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
8
Use of mental health services among disaster survivors: predisposing factors.
BMC Public Health. 2007 Jul 24;7:173. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-173.
9
Fire disaster caused by LPG tanker explosion at Lice in Diyarbakır (Turkey): July 21, 2014.
Burns. 2015 Sep;41(6):1347-52. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Mental Health Support after Natural Hazard Events: A Report from an Online Survey among Experts in Japan.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 4;19(5):3022. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19053022.
2
Dissociation and disasters: A systematic review.
World J Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 19;9(6):83-98. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v9.i6.83.
4
Trajectories of posttraumatic stress symptoms after civilian or deployment traumatic event experiences.
Psychol Trauma. 2017 Mar;9(2):138-146. doi: 10.1037/tra0000147. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
6
Guidelines for burn rehabilitation in China.
Burns Trauma. 2015 Oct 21;3:20. doi: 10.1186/s41038-015-0019-3. eCollection 2015.
7
Latent Growth Mixture Models to estimate PTSD trajectories.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 Mar 2;6:27503. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.27503. eCollection 2015.
8
The long-term impact of physical and emotional trauma: the station nightclub fire.
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047339. Epub 2012 Oct 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Weighing the Costs of Disaster: Consequences, Risks, and Resilience in Individuals, Families, and Communities.
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2010 Jan;11(1):1-49. doi: 10.1177/1529100610387086.
2
Health-related quality of life after burns: a prospective multicenter cohort study with 18 months follow-up.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Feb;72(2):513-20. doi: 10.1097/ta.0b013e3182199072.
3
Epidemiology and impact of scarring after burn injury: a systematic review of the literature.
J Burn Care Res. 2012 Jan-Feb;33(1):136-46. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182374452.
4
Risk factors of posttraumatic stress disorder among survivors after the 512 Wenchuan earthquake in China.
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022371. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
5
Prevalence and co-morbidity of psychiatric disorders 1-4 years after burn.
Burns. 2011 Aug;37(5):753-61. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.12.018. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
7
Long-term perspectives on posttraumatic growth in disaster survivors.
J Trauma Stress. 2010 Jun;23(3):413-6. doi: 10.1002/jts.20530.
8
Validation of a Swedish version of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) in patients with burns.
J Anxiety Disord. 2010 Aug;24(6):618-22. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.03.021. Epub 2010 Apr 12.
9
Psychometric properties of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised in patients one year after burn injury.
J Burn Care Res. 2010 Mar-Apr;31(2):310-8. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181d0f523.
10
Growth curve trajectories of distress in burn patients.
J Burn Care Res. 2010 Jan-Feb;31(1):64-72. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181cb8ee6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验