Suppr超能文献

一项评估新型专利纳米配方低剂量口服吲哚美辛药代动力学特征的 I 期研究。

A phase I study evaluating the pharmacokinetic profile of a novel, proprietary, nano-formulated, lower-dose oral indomethacin.

机构信息

Iroko Pharmaceuticals, Clinical and Medical Consultant, Navy Yard Corporate Center, Philadelphia, PA 19112, USA.

出版信息

Postgrad Med. 2012 Jul;124(4):197-205. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2012.07.2580.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Safety and tolerability concerns associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have prompted the development of lower-dose formulations. This phase 1 clinical study characterizes the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of an investigational, proprietary, nano-formulated, lower-dose oral indomethacin (nano-formulated indomethacin) compared with standard oral indomethacin in healthy subjects.

METHODS

Forty healthy subjects were enrolled in a single-dose, randomized, 5-period, 5-treatment crossover study. Subjects received nano-formulated indomethacin 20 mg (fasted), or nano-formulated indomethacin 40 mg or standard indomethacin 50 mg (fed and fasted). Pharmacokinetic parameters, including maximum measured plasma concentration (C(max)), time to maximum measured concentration (T(max)), elimination half-life (T(1/2)), and area under the concentration-time (AUC) curve, along with safety and tolerability, were assessed.

RESULTS

There was a more rapid mean (± standard deviation) Tmax for nano-formulated indomethacin 20 mg (1.11 ± 0.55 h) and 40 mg (1.25 ± 0.60 h) compared with indomethacin 50 mg (1.97 ± 0.81 h) under fasting conditions, demonstrating faster absorption for the nano-formulated indomethacin. The T(1/2) was similar for nano-formulated indomethacin 40 mg and indomethacin 50 mg. The C(max) for nano-formulated indomethacin 40 mg was higher compared with indomethacin 50 mg in fasted subjects (3115 ± 900 ng/mL vs 2759 ± 936 ng/mL, respectively), and slightly lower in fed subjects (1360 ± 424 ng/mL vs 1408 ± 469 ng/mL, respectively). There was a 26% reduction in drug exposure (AUC(0-∞)) when subjects received nano-formulated indomethacin 40 mg compared with indomethacin 50 mg under fasting conditions (6861 ± 1585 hng/mL vs 9306 ± 2234 hng/mL, respectively). Safety and tolerability were comparable between formulations.

CONCLUSION

The nano-formulated, lower-dose indomethacin had an improved PK profile compared with indomethacin. Under the advisory issued by worldwide regulatory agencies regarding use of lowest effective doses, these data may support use of lower-dose NSAID formulations that improve safety/tolerability while maintaining pain relief similar to standard NSAID formulations.

摘要

背景

非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)的安全性和耐受性问题促使人们开发低剂量制剂。本 1 期临床研究旨在比较新型、专利、纳米制剂的低剂量口服吲哚美辛(纳米制剂吲哚美辛)与标准口服吲哚美辛在健康受试者中的药代动力学(PK)特征。

方法

40 名健康受试者参加了一项单剂量、随机、5 期、5 种治疗交叉研究。受试者接受纳米制剂吲哚美辛 20mg(空腹)或纳米制剂吲哚美辛 40mg 或标准吲哚美辛 50mg(进食和空腹)。评估了包括最大实测血浆浓度(C(max))、达峰时间(T(max))、消除半衰期(T(1/2))、浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)在内的 PK 参数,以及安全性和耐受性。

结果

与空腹状态下的吲哚美辛 50mg(1.97±0.81h)相比,纳米制剂吲哚美辛 20mg(1.11±0.55h)和 40mg(1.25±0.60h)的平均(±标准差)Tmax 更快,表明纳米制剂吲哚美辛吸收更快。纳米制剂吲哚美辛 40mg 的 T(1/2)与吲哚美辛 50mg 相似。空腹受试者中,纳米制剂吲哚美辛 40mg 的 C(max)高于吲哚美辛 50mg(分别为 3115±900ng/ml 和 2759±936ng/ml),而进食受试者中则略低(分别为 1360±424ng/ml 和 1408±469ng/ml)。与吲哚美辛 50mg 相比,空腹状态下受试者接受纳米制剂吲哚美辛 40mg 时药物暴露量(AUC(0-∞))降低了 26%(分别为 6861±1585hng/ml 和 9306±2234hng/ml)。两种制剂的安全性和耐受性相当。

结论

与吲哚美辛相比,新型、低剂量的吲哚美辛具有更好的 PK 特征。在全球监管机构发布的关于使用最低有效剂量的建议下,这些数据可能支持使用可改善安全性/耐受性的低剂量 NSAID 制剂,同时保持与标准 NSAID 制剂相似的镇痛效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验