Suppr超能文献

解释自杀:在孟买市区贫民窟中寻找常见主题和不同视角。

Explaining suicide: identifying common themes and diverse perspectives in an urban Mumbai slum.

机构信息

GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(11):2037-46. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Aug 3.

Abstract

Rates, demographics and diagnostics, which are the focus of many studies of suicide, may provide an insufficient account without adequate consideration of psychological, social and cultural contexts and motives. Furthermore, reported explanations of suicide are shaped not only by events but also the relationship of survivor respondents explaining the suicide. An explanatory model interview for sociocultural autopsy has been used to assess underlying problems and perceived causes. This study in a low-income community of Mumbai in 2003-2004 compared accounts of the closest family survivors and more distant relationships. Our study design distinguished series-level agreement (i.e., consistency of accounts within a group) and case-level agreement for particular cases. Serious mental illness was the perceived cause reported by a respondent in either group for 22.0% of index suicides, but case-level agreement was only 6.0%. Regarding financial stressors, more closely related family respondents focused on acute stressors instead of enduring effects of poverty. Case-level agreement was high for marital problems, but low for other sources of family conflict. Tension was a feature of suicide reported in both groups, but case-level agreement on tension as a perceived cause was low (kappa = 0.14). The role of alcohol as a perceived cause of suicide had high series level agreement (46.0% in both groups) and case-level agreement (kappa = 0.60), suggesting comparable community and professional views of its significance. The study shows that it is relevant and feasible to consider general community patterns and particular survivor interests. Findings from this study recommend an approach to sociocultural autopsy to assess reasons for suicide in community studies. Findings clarify diverse views of underlying problems motivating suicide that should be considered to make mental health care more effective in assessing risk and preventing suicide.

摘要

自杀的许多研究重点关注发生率、人口统计学特征和诊断,但如果没有充分考虑到心理、社会和文化背景以及动机,这些因素可能无法充分说明问题。此外,自杀的报告解释不仅受到事件的影响,还受到幸存者解释自杀事件的关系的影响。社会文化剖检的解释性模型访谈已被用于评估潜在问题和感知原因。本研究于 2003-2004 年在孟买的一个低收入社区进行,比较了最亲近的家庭幸存者和关系稍远的受访者的说法。我们的研究设计区分了系列水平的一致性(即一组内说法的一致性)和特定案例的案例水平的一致性。严重精神疾病是两组受访者中都有 22.0%的指数自杀者认为的原因,但案例水平的一致性仅为 6.0%。关于经济压力源,关系更密切的家庭受访者更关注急性压力源,而不是贫困的持久影响。婚姻问题的案例水平一致性较高,但其他家庭冲突来源的案例水平一致性较低。紧张是两组都报告的自杀特征,但紧张作为感知原因的案例水平一致性较低(kappa = 0.14)。将酒精视为自杀原因的观点在两组中都具有较高的系列水平一致性(两组均为 46.0%)和案例水平一致性(kappa = 0.60),这表明社区和专业人士对其重要性的看法相似。该研究表明,考虑一般社区模式和特定幸存者利益是相关且可行的。本研究的结果建议采用社会文化剖检方法来评估社区研究中自杀的原因。研究结果澄清了促使自杀的潜在问题的不同观点,应该考虑这些观点,以使精神卫生保健在评估风险和预防自杀方面更加有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验