• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

北美护理诊断协会护理诊断分类法的发展

The development of NANDA's nursing diagnosis taxonomy.

作者信息

Warren J J, Hoskins L M

出版信息

Nurs Diagn. 1990 Oct-Dec;1(4):162-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1990.tb00434.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1744-618x.1990.tb00434.x
PMID:2291859
Abstract

In the early 1970s the need for a precise and computerizable language of nursing phenomena was identified. This need stimulated the formation of the National Conference Group for the Classification of Nursing Diagnoses. The group began the work of identifying nursing diagnoses and developing a taxonomic structure for their classification. Based on the initial success with the development of nursing diagnoses, the conference group became the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA). There are two benefits of taxonomic development within nursing: one is scientific in nature, while the other is applied or practical. The development of this taxonomy has occurred over a span of 17 years including nine national conferences. Details of this development have been abstracted from the proceedings of the nine conferences and the minutes of the Taxonomy Committee in order to explicate the taxonomic structure. The rules for the classification, developed by the committee, are presented. Future directions for taxonomic development and collaboration with other health care professions are proposed.

摘要

20世纪70年代初,人们认识到需要一种精确且可计算机化的护理现象语言。这种需求促使了护理诊断分类全国会议小组的成立。该小组开始了识别护理诊断并为其分类制定分类结构的工作。基于护理诊断开发的初步成功,该会议小组成为了北美护理诊断协会(NANDA)。护理领域分类学发展有两个好处:一个本质上是科学性的,另一个是应用型或实用性的。这种分类法的发展历经了17年,包括九次全国会议。为了阐明分类结构,已从九次会议的会议记录和分类学委员会的会议纪要中提取了这一发展的详细信息。介绍了委员会制定的分类规则。还提出了分类学发展的未来方向以及与其他医疗保健专业的合作。

相似文献

1
The development of NANDA's nursing diagnosis taxonomy.北美护理诊断协会护理诊断分类法的发展
Nurs Diagn. 1990 Oct-Dec;1(4):162-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1990.tb00434.x.
2
Development of definitions for taxonomy II.分类法II定义的制定。
Nurs Diagn. 1992 Apr-Jun;3(2):65-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1992.tb00205.x.
3
A unified nursing diagnostic model.
Image J Nurs Sch. 1990 Summer;22(2):93-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1990.tb00182.x.
4
NANDA's definition of nursing diagnosis: a plea for conceptual clarity.北美护理诊断协会(NANDA)对护理诊断的定义:呼吁概念清晰化。
Nurs Diagn. 1991 Jan-Mar;2(1):9-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1991.tb00325.x.
5
[The Taxonomy II proposed by the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA)].[北美护理诊断协会(NANDA)提出的分类法II]
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2003 Mar-Apr;11(2):240-4. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692003000200016.
6
Development and content validity testing of a comprehensive classification of diagnoses for pediatric nurse practitioners.儿科执业护士综合诊断分类的开发与内容效度测试。
Nurs Diagn. 1991 Jul-Sep;2(3):93-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1991.tb00343.x.
7
[The relationship among the adaptation modes of Roy and NANDA taxonomy of nursing diagnoses].[罗伊的适应模式与护理诊断的北美护理诊断协会分类法之间的关系]
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 1999 Oct;7(4):97-104.
8
Nursing diagnosis taxonomy across the Atlantic Ocean: congruence between nurses' charting and the NANDA taxonomy.跨越大西洋的护理诊断分类法:护士记录与北美护理诊断协会分类法之间的一致性
J Adv Nurs. 2002 Feb;37(4):372-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02101.x.
9
[Nursing diagnoses: questions and controversies].[护理诊断:问题与争议]
Pflege. 1999 Aug;12(4):209-15. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302.12.4.209.
10
An examination of the NANDA International taxonomy for domain completeness, ontological homogeneity, and clinical functionality.对国际护理诊断协会(NANDA)分类法进行领域完整性、本体同质性和临床功能方面的审查。
Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2008 Apr-Jun;19(2):65-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618X.2008.00083.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Standardized nursing language for healthcare information systems.
J Med Syst. 1992 Aug;16(4):145-59. doi: 10.1007/BF00999377.