University of Birmingham Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, City Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Oct;5(5):941-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.112.972869. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
Management decisions for thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation need to balance the risk of stroke against serious hemorrhage. The objective of the present analysis is to compare the Hypertension, Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile international normalized ratio, Elderly (>65 years), Drugs/alcohol concomitantly (HAS-BLED) score against other older bleeding risk scores and the new Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation score in an atrial fibrillation cohort.
Patients diagnosed with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in a 4-hospital institution between 2000 and 2010 were identified. Independent risk factors of bleeding were investigated using Cox regression. The predictive value of several bleeding risk schema was assessed using the c-statistic and net reclassification improvement. Oral anticoagulation use was highest in moderate-risk patients (59.8%) but only slightly more than high-risk (50.1%) and low-risk (46.4%) patients. Those at higher bleeding risk (HAS-BLED ≥ 3) were also at highest risk of stroke/thromboembolism or stroke/thromboembolism/death, as well as bleeding and all-cause mortality. On multivariable analysis, independent predictors of bleeding were age ≥ 75 years and age ≥ 65 years, alcohol excess, anemia, and heart failure. All risk scores had only modest predictive ability for bleeding, whether on vitamin K antagonist or not (c-statistic ≈0.6). When the HAS-BLED score was compared with other bleeding risk scores, the net reclassification improvement was significantly improved against all other scores tested.
Current oral anticoagulation prescribing patterns would suggest that bleeding risk estimation by clinicians is poor and that oral anticoagulation prescribing does not reflect bleeding risk per se. The HAS-BLED score performs well in relation to predicting bleeding events compared with older bleeding scores and the Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation score, with significantly improved reclassification using HAS-BLED compared with all other bleeding risk scores tested.
心房颤动的血栓预防管理决策需要权衡中风风险与严重出血的风险。本分析的目的是比较高血压、肾功能/肝功能异常、中风、出血史或倾向、不稳定的国际标准化比值、年龄>65 岁、同时使用药物/酒精(HAS-BLED)评分与其他较老的出血风险评分以及新的心房颤动抗凝和危险因素评分在心房颤动队列中的表现。
在 2000 年至 2010 年期间,在一家拥有 4 家医院的机构中确定了诊断为非瓣膜性心房颤动的患者。使用 Cox 回归调查出血的独立危险因素。使用 C 统计量和净重新分类改善来评估几种出血风险方案的预测价值。中度风险患者(59.8%)的口服抗凝剂使用率最高,但仅略高于高风险(50.1%)和低风险(46.4%)患者。出血风险较高(HAS-BLED≥3)的患者也面临最高的中风/血栓栓塞或中风/血栓栓塞/死亡风险,以及出血和全因死亡率。多变量分析显示,出血的独立预测因素是年龄≥75 岁和年龄≥65 岁、酒精过量、贫血和心力衰竭。所有风险评分对于出血的预测能力都很有限,无论是维生素 K 拮抗剂还是非维生素 K 拮抗剂(C 统计量≈0.6)。当 HAS-BLED 评分与其他出血风险评分进行比较时,与所有其他测试的评分相比,净重新分类改善显著提高。
目前的口服抗凝剂处方模式表明,临床医生对出血风险的评估较差,口服抗凝剂的处方并不能反映出血风险本身。与较老的出血评分和心房颤动抗凝和危险因素评分相比,HAS-BLED 评分在预测出血事件方面表现良好,与所有其他测试的出血风险评分相比,HAS-BLED 的重新分类显著改善。