Wang Kai, Ou Yan, Ge Quan-Sheng
College of Tourism, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2012 Jun;23(6):1663-70.
Based on the investigation in three typical migrant resettlement spots in Wulingyuan Scenic Area, a demonstration analysis was conducted on the residents' perception to the effects of ecological migration on world heritage site. The residents in the 3 spots had great differences in the positive perception to the economic effects of ecological migration, but less differences in the perception to the negative indices. The residents had high identity with the positive socio-cultural effects, but weak perception to the negative effects. The residents in the 3 resettlement spots had obvious differences in the perception to the effects on resources and environment, but mostly agreed that the negative psychological effects were not so obvious. The negative comments were given to the main migration policies. Age, educational level, monthly income, and proportion of tourism input were the main factors affecting the residents' perception, and the way of resettlement as well as the proportion of tourism input also had important effects on the residents' perception. Migration policy was the dominant factor affecting the integral perception of the residents to ecological migration.
基于对武陵源风景名胜区三个典型移民安置点的调查,对居民对生态移民对世界遗产地影响的认知进行了实证分析。三个安置点的居民对生态移民经济影响的积极认知存在较大差异,但对负面指标的认知差异较小。居民对积极的社会文化影响认同感较高,但对负面影响的认知较弱。三个安置点的居民对资源与环境影响的认知存在明显差异,但大多认为负面心理影响不明显。对主要移民政策存在负面评价。年龄、文化程度、月收入和旅游收入占比是影响居民认知的主要因素,安置方式以及旅游收入占比也对居民认知有重要影响。移民政策是影响居民对生态移民整体认知的主导因素。