Adams Karen, Bombardier Claire, van der Heijde Désirée
Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de l'Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada.
J Rheumatol Suppl. 2012 Sep;90:56-8. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120343.
To systematically review the efficacy and safety of on-demand versus continuous use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) in patients with inflammatory arthritis and to assess if longterm continuous treatment with NSAID in comparison with NSAID treatment on-demand reduces radiographic progression.
A systematic literature review was performed in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism 2008-2009 meeting abstracts as part of the multinational 3e (Evidence, Expertise, Exchange) Initiative for generating practical recommendations about Pain Management by Pharmacotherapy in Inflammatory Arthritis. Articles fulfilling predefined inclusion criteria were reviewed and quality appraisal was performed.
The search yielded a total of 1410 articles from Medline and Embase, 73 from Cochrane Central, and 3 meeting abstracts. After review, only one study fulfilled the defined inclusion criteria, which indicated that longterm continuous treatment with NSAID versus NSAID treatment on-demand reduced radiographic progression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Secondary measured endpoints were disease activity measures including pain and the frequency of observed adverse events in both groups. Relevant adverse events tended to occur more frequently in the continuous treatment group with odds ratios of 2.79 for hypertension, 1.67 for abdominal pain, 1.35 for diarrhea, 0.95 for dyspepsia, and 3.2 for depression. None of these differences were statistically significant, with the exception of depression, which could not be explained.
Based on a single study, there does not seem to be a statistical difference in efficacy between the on-demand versus continuous use of NSAID in the context of ankylosing spondylitis. There were no studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or spondyloarthritis. Research is needed to study the risk-benefit ratio of continuous versus on-demand use of NSAID.
系统评价按需使用与持续使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)治疗炎性关节炎患者的疗效和安全性,并评估与按需使用NSAID相比,长期持续使用NSAID是否能减少影像学进展。
作为多国3e(证据、专业知识、交流)倡议的一部分,在Medline、Embase、Cochrane图书馆以及美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿病联盟2008 - 2009年会议摘要中进行系统的文献综述,以生成关于炎性关节炎药物治疗疼痛管理的实用建议。对符合预定义纳入标准的文章进行综述并进行质量评估。
检索共得到Medline和Embase的1410篇文章、Cochrane Central的73篇文章以及3篇会议摘要。经审查,只有一项研究符合定义的纳入标准,该研究表明,与按需使用NSAID相比,长期持续使用NSAID可减少强直性脊柱炎患者的影像学进展。次要测量终点为疾病活动指标,包括疼痛以及两组观察到的不良事件发生频率。连续治疗组相关不良事件的发生频率往往更高,高血压的比值比为2.79,腹痛为1.67,腹泻为1.35,消化不良为0.95,抑郁为3.2。除抑郁无法解释外,这些差异均无统计学意义。
基于一项研究,在强直性脊柱炎中,按需使用与持续使用NSAID的疗效似乎无统计学差异。类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎或脊柱关节炎患者中尚无相关研究。需要开展研究以探讨持续使用与按需使用NSAID的风险效益比。