Nair Sajan V, Padmanabhan Ratna, Janardhanam P
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Sri Sankara Dental College, Varkala, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Mar-Apr;23(2):203-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.100426.
The aim of this study was to consider friction in buccal segment attachments during overjet reduction by means of sliding mechanics. Friction was compared in Stainless Steel, Titanium and Cobalt Chromium brackets, using Stainless Steel and Beta Titanium wires.
This in-vitro study comprised 18 samples (6 x 3 brackets of different materials-stainless steel, titanium and cobalt chromium). Each jig comprised of a buccal segment model of two premolar brackets and a molar tube simulating the upper posterior buccal segment. Each jig was coupled with the wire of 0.019 x 0.025 inch dimension and was tested with a Universal Testing Machine. Ligation was achieved using low friction elastomeric modules (Slide, Leone, Italy), a non-conventional elastomeric module.
All three bracket systems showed significantly higher frictional forces for the beta titanium wire than for the stainless steel wire. When coupled with the stainless steel wire, the titanium bracket showed the least friction, followed by stainless steel and cobalt chromium brackets. When coupled with the beta titanium wire, the titanium brackets again showed the least friction; while the difference in frictional levels between the stainless steel and cobalt chromium brackets was not statistically significant. The titanium brackets showed the least friction among all the groups tested for both wires.
Titanium bracket with Beta Titanium wires could and probably should be the alternative metal bracket used in the nickel sensitive patient.
本研究旨在探讨在通过滑动机制减少覆盖时颊侧段附件中的摩擦力。比较了使用不锈钢丝和β钛丝时,不锈钢、钛和钴铬合金托槽的摩擦力。
这项体外研究包括18个样本(6组,每组3个不同材料的托槽——不锈钢、钛和钴铬合金)。每个夹具由两个前磨牙托槽的颊侧段模型和一个模拟上颌后颊侧段的磨牙管组成。每个夹具与尺寸为0.019×0.025英寸的钢丝相连,并使用万能试验机进行测试。使用低摩擦弹性模块(Slide,意大利莱昂内公司)进行结扎,这是一种非常规弹性模块。
所有三种托槽系统在β钛丝上的摩擦力均显著高于不锈钢丝。与不锈钢丝相连时,钛托槽的摩擦力最小,其次是不锈钢托槽和钴铬合金托槽。与β钛丝相连时,钛托槽的摩擦力仍然最小;而不锈钢托槽和钴铬合金托槽之间的摩擦水平差异无统计学意义。在测试的所有组中,钛托槽在两种钢丝上的摩擦力均最小。
对于对镍敏感的患者,钛托槽搭配β钛丝可能且应该成为替代金属托槽。