Suma S, Anita G, Chandra Shekar B R, Kallury Amitabh
Department of Orthodontics, People's Dental Academy, Bhanpur, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Mar-Apr;23(2):230-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.100432.
Bonding brackets to fluorosed enamel remains a clinical challenge and bracket failure at the compromised enamel interface is common.
To check the effect of air abrasion on the retention of metallic brackets bonded to fluorosed enamel surface.
Sixty freshly extracted human premolar teeth having moderate to severe dental fluorosis as per Dean's criteria were collected and divided into three groups of 20 each. The groups were treated as follows: In group I, acid etching was followed by bonding with Transbond XT ; in group II, sandblasting and acid etching was followed by bonding with Transbond XT ; and in group III, sandblasting and acid etching was followed by bonding with Enlight LC . An Instron universal testing machine was used for determining the debonding force, and from this the shear bond strength was computed. The sample with highest shear bond strength from each group was selected for the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) study. The prepared specimens were examined under a JSM-840A scanning electron microscope (JEOL Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) operated at 20 kV. Photographs were taken at progressively higher magnifications of ×50, ×100, ×500, and ×1000 to view the enamel surface and the adhesive remaining on the enamel surface after debonding. The shear bond strengths of the groups were compared using the one-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) and Tukey post hoc test. The distribution of adhesive remnant index (ARI) score was compared using the Chi-square test.
The mean shear bond strength in group I was 10.36 MPa, with a standard deviation of 0.225. The corresponding values in group II and group III were 11.41 ± 0.237 MPa and 11.39 ± 0.201 Mpa, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the three groups in the mean shear bond strength values.
Sandblasting followed by acid etching provides significantly higher bond strength values compared to acid etching alone, irrespective of the bonding material employed.
将托槽粘结到氟斑牙釉质上仍然是一项临床挑战,并且在受损的釉质界面处托槽脱落很常见。
检查空气喷砂对粘结在氟斑牙釉质表面的金属托槽固位力的影响。
按照迪恩标准收集60颗新拔除的患有中度至重度氟斑牙的人类前磨牙,并将其分为三组,每组20颗。分组处理如下:第一组,酸蚀后用Transbond XT粘结;第二组,喷砂和酸蚀后用Transbond XT粘结;第三组,喷砂和酸蚀后用Enlight LC粘结。使用英斯特朗万能试验机测定脱粘力,并据此计算剪切粘结强度。从每组中选择剪切粘结强度最高的样本进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)研究。制备的标本在一台工作电压为20 kV的JSM - 840A扫描电子显微镜(日本东京电子株式会社)下进行检查。在放大倍数逐渐增加为×50、×100、×500和×1000时拍照,以观察釉质表面以及脱粘后留在釉质表面的粘结剂。使用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey事后检验比较各组的剪切粘结强度。使用卡方检验比较粘结剂残留指数(ARI)评分的分布。
第一组的平均剪切粘结强度为10.36 MPa,标准差为0.225。第二组和第三组的相应值分别为11.41±0.237 MPa和11.39±0.201 Mpa。三组的平均剪切粘结强度值之间存在统计学显著差异。
与单独酸蚀相比,无论使用何种粘结材料,喷砂后再进行酸蚀可提供显著更高的粘结强度值。