Charles David, Brashear Allison, Hauser Robert A, Li Hung-Ir, Boo Lee-Ming, Brin Mitchell F
Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Clin Neuropharmacol. 2012 Sep-Oct;35(5):208-14. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0b013e31826538c7.
To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and neutralizing antibodies in the treatment of cervical dystonia with onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX).
Subjects received onabotulinumtoxinA (containing original bulk toxin) treatment in a 10-week open-label period (period 1). Eligible subjects who completed this period were randomized to onabotulinumtoxinA or placebo in a 10-week double-blind period (period 2). The primary outcome measures were the Cervical Dystonia Severity Scale and the physician Global Assessment Scale at week 6 in period 2. Serum samples for immunogenicity tests were taken at baseline and study exit. The potential impact of preexisting neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) was examined across subgroups for period 1 and by analysis of covariance for period 2.
Of 214 subjects enrolled in period 1, 170 enrolled in period 2 and received placebo (n = 82) or onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 88). In period 1, subjects with preexisting nAbs responded similarly to those without preexisting nAbs. In period 2, onabotulinumtoxinA produced significantly greater improvements than placebo on the Cervical Dystonia Severity Scale (-1.81 vs -0.31 points; P = 0.012) and physician Global Assessment Scale (61.7% vs. 41.6% improved; P = 0.022) at the primary time point week 6, using baseline severity and neutralizing antibody (nAb) status at study entry as covariates. Two subjects seroconverted from nAb negative at baseline to nAb positive at study exit but remained responsive to onabotulinumtoxinA during both the open and blinded treatment periods. Rhinitis and treatment-related dysphagia were reported significantly more frequently with onabotulinumtoxinA than placebo.
OnabotulinumtoxinA was well tolerated and more effective than placebo for the treatment of cervical dystonia. Subject nAb status at baseline was not a clear predictor of response to onabotulinumtoxinA.
评估A型肉毒毒素(保妥适)治疗颈部肌张力障碍的疗效、耐受性及中和抗体情况。
受试者在为期10周的开放标签期(第1阶段)接受A型肉毒毒素(含原始粗制毒素)治疗。完成该阶段的符合条件受试者在为期10周的双盲期(第2阶段)被随机分为接受A型肉毒毒素或安慰剂治疗。主要结局指标为第2阶段第6周时的颈部肌张力障碍严重程度量表和医生整体评估量表。在基线期和研究结束时采集血清样本进行免疫原性检测。在第1阶段的各亚组中以及通过第2阶段的协方差分析检查预先存在的中和抗体(nAbs)的潜在影响。
在第1阶段入组的214名受试者中,170名进入第2阶段并接受了安慰剂(n = 82)或A型肉毒毒素(n = 88)治疗。在第1阶段,预先存在nAbs的受试者与未预先存在nAbs的受试者反应相似。在第2阶段,在主要时间点第6周时,以研究入组时的基线严重程度和中和抗体(nAb)状态作为协变量,A型肉毒毒素在颈部肌张力障碍严重程度量表上的改善显著大于安慰剂(-1.81对-0.31分;P = 0.012),在医生整体评估量表上改善情况也更优(改善比例为61.7%对41.6%;P = 0.022)。两名受试者从基线时nAb阴性血清转化为研究结束时nAb阳性,但在开放和盲法治疗期均对A型肉毒毒素有反应。与安慰剂相比,A型肉毒毒素治疗导致鼻炎和治疗相关吞咽困难的报告频率显著更高。
A型肉毒毒素耐受性良好,治疗颈部肌张力障碍比安慰剂更有效。受试者基线时的nAb状态并非对A型肉毒毒素反应的明确预测指标。