Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Cedex 08, France.
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct 1;30(28):3516-24. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.9782. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
This phase III study investigated whether continuation maintenance with gemcitabine or switch maintenance with erlotinib improves clinical outcome compared with observation in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease was controlled after cisplatin-gemcitabine induction chemotherapy.
Four hundred sixty-four patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC without tumor progression after four cycles of cisplatin-gemcitabine were randomly assigned to observation or to gemcitabine (1,250 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle) or daily erlotinib (150 mg/day) study arms. On disease progression, patients in all three arms received pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2) once every 21 days) as predefined second-line therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).
PFS was significantly prolonged by gemcitabine (median, 3.8 v 1.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.72; log-rank P < .001) and erlotinib (median, 2.9 v 1.9 months; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.88; log-rank P = .003) versus observation; this benefit was consistent across all clinical subgroups. Both maintenance strategies resulted in a nonsignificant improvement in overall survival (OS); patients who received second-line pemetrexed or with a performance status of 0 appeared to derive greater benefit. Exploratory analysis showed that magnitude of response to induction chemotherapy may affect the OS benefit as a result of gemcitabine maintenance. Maintenance gemcitabine and erlotinib were well tolerated with no unexpected adverse events.
Gemcitabine continuation maintenance or erlotinib switch maintenance significantly reduces disease progression in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with cisplatin-gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy. Response to induction chemotherapy may affect OS only for continuation maintenance.
本 III 期研究旨在探讨在接受顺铂-吉西他滨诱导化疗后疾病得到控制的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中,与观察相比,继续维持治疗使用吉西他滨或切换维持治疗使用厄洛替尼是否能改善临床结局。
464 例 IIIB/IV 期 NSCLC 患者在接受顺铂-吉西他滨四周期诱导化疗后无肿瘤进展,随机分配至观察组或吉西他滨(1250mg/m2,每 3 周周期的第 1 和第 8 天)或厄洛替尼(150mg/天)组。疾病进展后,所有三组患者均接受培美曲塞(500mg/m2,每 21 天一次)作为预设的二线治疗。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。
吉西他滨(中位 PFS:3.8 个月比 1.9 个月;风险比 [HR],0.56;95%CI,0.44 至 0.72;对数秩检验 P<0.001)和厄洛替尼(中位 PFS:2.9 个月比 1.9 个月;HR,0.69;95%CI,0.54 至 0.88;对数秩检验 P=0.003)与观察组相比,PFS 显著延长;这种获益在所有临床亚组中均一致。两种维持策略均未显著改善总生存期(OS);接受二线培美曲塞治疗或表现状态为 0 的患者似乎获益更大。探索性分析表明,诱导化疗的缓解程度可能会影响吉西他滨维持治疗的 OS 获益。维持吉西他滨和厄洛替尼治疗耐受性良好,无意外不良反应。
吉西他滨维持治疗或厄洛替尼切换维持治疗可显著降低接受顺铂-吉西他滨作为一线化疗的晚期 NSCLC 患者的疾病进展。诱导化疗的缓解程度可能仅影响继续维持治疗的 OS。