Suppr超能文献

两种氯化铝螯合方法用于黄酮类定量的可靠性的批判性评价。

A critical evaluation on the reliability of two aluminum chloride chelation methods for quantification of flavonoids.

机构信息

Department of Chemistry, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara 390 002, India.

出版信息

Food Chem. 2012 Dec 1;135(3):1365-8. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.05.109. Epub 2012 Jun 7.

Abstract

Flavonols kaempferol, quercetin, myricetin and gossypetin, and flavones apigenin, acacetin, luteolin, orientin and tricin, are subjected to two AlCl(3) spectrophotometric methods used for determination of total flavonoid content. The method developed by Woisky and Salatino involves addition of AlCl(3) solution to the flavonoid solution and recording of optical density at 420nm. All flavonols except kaempferol have absorption maxima above 440nm and so readings at 420nm are erroneous. Among flavones, all except for luteolin and orientin, have absorption maxima below 400nm. Further, addition of CH(3)COOK and recording the absorbance at 415nm, as modified by Chang et al., works well for flavonols kaempferol, quercetin and myricetin, but not for gossypetin. The flavones luteolin and orientin absorbed above 400nm, whereas all others absorbed below 400nm. Examination of the results of both methods indicates they are inadequate, and should not to be considered as universal and standard methods for total flavonoid determination.

摘要

黄酮醇(山奈酚、槲皮素、杨梅素和棉子糖)和黄酮(芹菜素、木犀草素、叶黄素、橙皮苷和荞麦碱)采用两种三氯化铝分光光度法测定总黄酮含量。Woisky 和 Salatino 开发的方法涉及将三氯化铝溶液加入黄酮溶液中,并在 420nm 处记录光密度。除山奈酚外,所有黄酮醇的吸收最大值均高于 440nm,因此在 420nm 处的读数是错误的。在黄酮类中,除叶黄素和橙皮苷外,所有黄酮类的吸收最大值均低于 400nm。进一步,Chang 等人修改的方法,加入 CH(3)COOK 并在 415nm 处记录吸光度,适用于黄酮醇(山奈酚、槲皮素和杨梅素),但不适用于棉子糖。叶黄素和橙皮苷在 400nm 以上吸收,而其他所有物质在 400nm 以下吸收。两种方法的结果表明,它们不够充分,不应该被认为是总黄酮测定的通用和标准方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验