Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉搭桥手术高危患者预防性主动脉内球囊反搏:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Sá Michel Pompeu B O, Ferraz Paulo E, Escobar Rodrigo R, Martins Wendell N, Nunes Eliobas O, Vasconcelos Frederico P, Lima Ricardo C

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery of Pronto Socorro Cardiológico de Pernambuco - PROCAPE, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.

出版信息

Coron Artery Dis. 2012 Nov;23(7):480-6. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e328358784d.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL/CCTR, SciELO, LILACS, Google Scholar, and reference lists of relevant articles were searched. We included only randomized controlled trials. Assessments for eligibility, relevance, and study validity and data extraction were performed in duplicate using prespecified criteria. Meta-analysis was carried out using fixed-effect and random-effect models.

RESULTS

Seven publications fulfilled our eligibility criteria. There was no important statistical heterogeneity or publication bias among included studies. In total, 177 patients received prophylactic IABP and 168 did not. Overall relative risk (RR) for hospital mortality in patients treated with prophylactic IABP was 0.255 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.122-0.533; P<0.001; same results for both effect models]. Pooled RR for postoperative low cardiac output syndrome was 0.206 (95% CI, 0.109-0.389; P<0.001) for the fixed-effect model and 0.219 (95% CI, 0.095-0.504; P<0.001) for the random-effect model. Patients treated with prophylactic IABP presented an overall difference in means for length of intensive care unit stay and hospital stay, which was lower than that in the control group (P<0.001 for both effect models). Only 7.4% (13/177) of patients who received prophylactic IABP developed complications at an insertion site, with no IABP-related death.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis supports the use of prophylactic IABP in high-risk patients to reduce hospital mortality.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估预防性主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)在接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的高危患者中的疗效。

方法

检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL/CCTR、SciELO、LILACS、谷歌学术以及相关文章的参考文献列表。我们仅纳入随机对照试验。使用预先设定的标准对纳入标准、相关性、研究有效性和数据提取进行了重复评估。采用固定效应模型和随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。

结果

七篇出版物符合我们的纳入标准。纳入研究之间没有重要的统计学异质性或发表偏倚。总共有177例患者接受了预防性IABP,168例未接受。接受预防性IABP治疗的患者医院死亡率的总体相对风险(RR)为0.255[95%置信区间(CI),0.122 - 0.533;P<0.001;两种效应模型结果相同]。固定效应模型下术后低心排血量综合征的合并RR为0.206(95%CI,0.109 - 0.389;P<0.001),随机效应模型下为0.219(95%CI,0.095 - 0.504;P<0.001)。接受预防性IABP治疗的患者在重症监护病房住院时间和住院时间的总体均值差异低于对照组(两种效应模型均为P<0.001)。接受预防性IABP的患者中只有7.4%(13/177)在置入部位出现并发症,无IABP相关死亡。

结论

这项荟萃分析支持在高危患者中使用预防性IABP以降低医院死亡率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验