• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗癫痫药物在成人中的疗效可预测其在儿童中的疗效:系统评价。

Efficacy of antiepileptic drugs in adults predicts efficacy in children: a systematic review.

机构信息

Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

出版信息

Neurology. 2012 Oct 2;79(14):1482-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826d5ec0. Epub 2012 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826d5ec0
PMID:22955136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4098824/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Due to the challenges inherent in performing clinical trials in children, a systematic review of published clinical trials was performed to determine whether the efficacy of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in adults can be used to predict the efficacy of AEDs in the pediatric population.

METHODS

Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library searches (1970-January 2010) were conducted for clinical trials of partial-onset seizures (POS) and primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) in adults and in children <2 and 2-18 years. Independent epidemiologists used standardized search and study evaluation criteria to select eligible trials. Forest plots were used to investigate the relative strength of placebo-subtracted effect measures.

RESULTS

Among 30 adjunctive therapy POS trials in adults and children (2-18 years) that met evaluation criteria, effect measures were consistent between adults and children for gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate. Placebo-subtracted median percent seizure reduction between baseline and treatment periods (ranging from 7.0% to 58.6% in adults and from 10.5% to 31.2% in children) was significant for 40/46 and 6/6 of the treatment groups studied. The ≥50% responder rate (ranging from 2.0% to 43.0% in adults and from 3.0% to 26.0% in children) was significant for 37/43 and 5/8 treatment groups. In children <2 years, an insufficient number of trials were eligible for analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review supports the extrapolation of efficacy results in adults to predict a similar adjunctive treatment response in 2- to 18-year-old children with POS.

摘要

目的

由于在儿童中进行临床试验存在固有挑战,因此对已发表的临床试验进行了系统评价,以确定抗癫痫药物(AED)在成人中的疗效是否可用于预测其在儿科人群中的疗效。

方法

对 Medline/PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆(1970 年 1 月至 2010 年 1 月)进行了检索,以寻找成人和 <2 岁和 2-18 岁儿童部分性发作(POS)和原发性全面强直阵挛发作(PGTCS)的临床试验。独立的流行病学家使用标准化的搜索和研究评估标准来选择合格的试验。森林图用于研究安慰剂减去效应量的相对强度。

结果

在符合评估标准的 30 项成人和儿童(2-18 岁)辅助治疗 POS 试验中,加巴喷丁、拉莫三嗪、左乙拉西坦、奥卡西平、托吡酯在成人和儿童中的疗效指标一致。基线至治疗期之间的安慰剂减去的中位数癫痫发作减少百分比(在成人中为 7.0%至 58.6%,在儿童中为 10.5%至 31.2%)在 46 个治疗组中的 40 个和 6 个治疗组中均有显著意义。≥50%的应答率(在成人中为 2.0%至 43.0%,在儿童中为 3.0%至 26.0%)在 43 个治疗组中的 37 个和 8 个治疗组中的 5 个中均有显著意义。在 <2 岁的儿童中,可用于分析的试验数量不足。

结论

本系统评价支持将成人的疗效结果外推,以预测 2 至 18 岁儿童 POS 的辅助治疗反应相似。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of antiepileptic drugs in adults predicts efficacy in children: a systematic review.抗癫痫药物在成人中的疗效可预测其在儿童中的疗效:系统评价。
Neurology. 2012 Oct 2;79(14):1482-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826d5ec0. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
2
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.抗癫痫药物单药治疗癫痫:一项个体参与者数据的网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub4.
3
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.癫痫的抗癫痫药物单药治疗:个体参与者数据的网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 29;6(6):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub2.
4
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.癫痫的抗癫痫药物单药治疗:个体参与者数据的网状荟萃分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 15;12(12):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub3.
5
Clinical effectiveness, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of newer drugs for epilepsy in adults: a systematic review and economic evaluation.成人癫痫新药的临床疗效、耐受性及成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(15):1-157, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9150.
6
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.拉莫三嗪与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 28;6(6):CD001031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001031.pub4.
7
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.拉莫三嗪与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 14;11(11):CD001031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001031.pub3.
8
Topiramate versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.托吡酯与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:个体参与者数据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 6;12(12):CD012065. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012065.pub2.
9
Levetiracetam add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy: an updated Cochrane Review.左乙拉西坦添加治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫:Cochrane系统评价的更新版
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD001901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001901.pub2.
10
Carbamazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.卡马西平与苯妥英钠单药治疗癫痫:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 27;2(2):CD001911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001911.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Did pediatric drug development advance epilepsy treatment in young patients? It is time for new research goals.儿科药物研发是否推动了年轻患者癫痫治疗的进展?是时候设定新的研究目标了。
World J Methodol. 2024 Jun 20;14(2):92371. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v14.i2.92371.
2
Sources of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability and clinical pharmacology studies of antiseizure medications in the pediatric population.儿科人群中抗癫痫药物的药代动力学和药效学变异性来源及临床药理学研究
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Apr;17(4):e13793. doi: 10.1111/cts.13793.
3
Anti-seizure Medications: Challenges and Opportunities.抗癫痫药物:挑战与机遇。
CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2024;23(9):1120-1133. doi: 10.2174/0118715273275793231030060833.
4
Kaleidoscopic Hues of Antiepileptics in Pediatric Population: Comparison of Prevailing Antiepileptics.儿科人群中抗癫痫药物的千变万化色彩:常用抗癫痫药物的比较
Cureus. 2023 May 18;15(5):e39173. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39173. eCollection 2023 May.
5
Considerations for determining the efficacy of new antiseizure medications in children age 1 month to younger than 2 years.考虑确定 1 月龄至 2 岁以下儿童新抗癫痫药物疗效的相关因素。
Epilepsia. 2022 Oct;63(10):2664-2670. doi: 10.1111/epi.17366. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
6
Treatment of Focal-Onset Seizures in Children: Should This Be More Etiology-Driven?儿童局灶性发作的治疗:是否应更多地由病因驱动?
Front Neurol. 2022 Mar 7;13:842276. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.842276. eCollection 2022.
7
COVID-19 and Treatment and Immunization of Children-The Time to Redefine Pediatric Age Groups is Here.新型冠状病毒肺炎与儿童治疗及免疫——重新定义儿童年龄组的时候到了。
Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2021 Apr 29;12(2):e0010. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10433.
8
Pregabalin Population Pharmacokinetic and Exposure-Response Analyses for Focal Onset Seizures in Children (4-16 years) and Adults, to Support Dose Recommendations in Children.普瑞巴林用于儿童(4-16 岁)和成人局灶性发作癫痫的群体药代动力学和暴露-反应分析,支持儿童剂量推荐。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jul;110(1):132-140. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2132. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
9
Predicted Efficacy of Once-Daily Extended-Release Oxcarbazepine (Oxtellar XR) Monotherapy in Adults and Children with Partial-Onset Seizures: Exposure-Response Modeling and Simulation.每日一次缓释奥卡西平(奥卡西平缓释片)单药治疗成人和儿童部分性发作的预测疗效:暴露-反应建模与模拟
Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Sep 23;12:135-147. doi: 10.2147/CPAA.S256972. eCollection 2020.
10
Open-label study to investigate the safety and efficacy of adjunctive perampanel in pediatric patients (4 to <12 years) with inadequately controlled focal seizures or generalized tonic-clonic seizures.一项开放性标签研究旨在调查附加性佩兰尼酮在未充分控制局灶性发作或全面强直阵挛性发作的儿科患者(4 岁至<12 岁)中的安全性和疗效。
Epilepsia. 2020 Jan;61(1):125-137. doi: 10.1111/epi.16413. Epub 2020 Jan 7.

本文引用的文献

1
The development of medicines for children. Part of a series on Pediatric Pharmacology, guest edited by Gianvincenzo Zuccotti, Emilio Clementi, and Massimo Molteni.儿童用药的发展。本系列文章为儿科药理学的一部分,由 Gianvincenzo Zuccotti、Emilio Clementi 和 Massimo Molteni 客座编辑。
Pharmacol Res. 2011 Sep;64(3):169-75. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2011.01.016. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
2
Randomized trial of adjunctive topiramate therapy in infants with refractory partial seizures.随机试验辅助托吡酯治疗婴儿耐药性部分性癫痫发作。
Neurology. 2010 Mar 2;74(9):714-20. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181d1cd4c. Epub 2010 Jan 20.
3
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目:PRISMA声明
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
4
Adjunctive levetiracetam in infants and young children with refractory partial-onset seizures.左乙拉西坦辅助治疗婴幼儿难治性局灶性癫痫发作
Epilepsia. 2009 May;50(5):1141-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01981.x. Epub 2009 Feb 21.
5
Antiepileptic drug development in children: considerations for a revisited strategy.儿童抗癫痫药物的研发:对重新审视策略的思考
Drugs. 2008;68(1):17-25. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200868010-00002.
6
Adjunctive lamotrigine for partial seizures in patients aged 1 to 24 months.1至24个月大患者辅助使用拉莫三嗪治疗部分性癫痫发作。
Neurology. 2008 May 27;70(22 Pt 2):2099-108. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000285493.08622.35. Epub 2007 Dec 12.
7
Topiramate monotherapy in newly diagnosed epilepsy in children and adolescents.托吡酯单药治疗儿童和青少年新诊断的癫痫
J Child Neurol. 2007 Jun;22(6):693-9. doi: 10.1177/0883073807303997.
8
Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs II: treatment of refractory epilepsy [RETIRED]: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee and Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society.新型抗癫痫药物的疗效与耐受性II:难治性癫痫的治疗[已停用]:美国神经病学学会和美国癫痫协会治疗与技术评估小组委员会及质量标准小组委员会的报告
Neurology. 2004 Apr 27;62(8):1261-73. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000123695.22623.32.
9
A randomized, placebo-controlled study of topiramate in primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Topiramate YTC Study Group.托吡酯治疗原发性全面强直阵挛发作的随机、安慰剂对照研究。托吡酯YTC研究组。
Neurology. 1999 Apr 22;52(7):1330-7. doi: 10.1212/wnl.52.7.1330.
10
The development of antiepileptic drugs for children. Report from the NIH workshop, Bethesda, Maryland, February 17-18, 1994.儿童抗癫痫药物的研发。国立卫生研究院研讨会报告,马里兰州贝塞斯达,1994年2月17 - 18日。
Epilepsy Res. 1996 Feb;23(1):87-92. doi: 10.1016/0920-1211(95)00043-7.