Meimoun P, Clerc J, Ghannem M, Neykova A, Tzvetkov B, Germain A-L, Elmkies F, Zemir H, Luycx-Bore A
Service de cardiologie et de soins intensifs, centre hospitalier de Compiègne, 8, rue Henri-Adnot, 60321 Compiègne, France.
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2012 Nov;61(5):323-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2012.08.029. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
After acute myocardial infarction (MI) coronary microvascular impairment and reduced exercise capacity are both determinant of prognosis.
We tested whether non-invasive coronary flow reserve (CFR) performed after MI predicts post-MI exercise capacity (EC).
Fifty consecutive patients (pts) (mean age 56.5±11years, 30% women) with a first reperfused ST-elevation anterior MI, and sustained TIMI 3 flow after mechanical reperfusion, underwent prospectively non-invasive CFR in the distal part of the left anterior descending artery (LAD), using intravenous adenosine infusion (0.14mg/kg per minute, within 2min), within 24h after successful primary coronary angioplasty (CFR 1), and 4±1.6months later after a period of convalescence and a cardiac rehabilitation program (CFR 2). CFR was defined as peak hyperaemic LAD flow velocity divided by baseline flow velocity. All pts also underwent semi-supine exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) the same day of CFR 2. ESE was performed at an initial workload of 25-30watts with a 20watts increase at 2-minute intervals. Beta-blockers were withheld 24h before ESE.
The mean CFR 2 increased significantly when compared to CFR 1 (2.9±0.65 versus 1.9±0.4, P<0.01). During ESE, percentage of maximal predict heart rate achieved was 82±12%, maximal workload 95±30watts, exercise duration 486±155s, the ratio of double product 3.1±0.8, and EC 5.8±1.1 metabolic equivalents. No ischemia was induced during ESE in all pts, and the degree of mitral regurgitation did not differ significantly between rest and exercise. CFR 2 was significantly correlated to all indices related to EC (all, P<0.01), whereas CFR 1 was correlated to LV systolic function at follow-up (P<0.05) but not to EC. In multivariate analysis including age, sex, and body mass index, CFR 2 remained an independent predictor of EC (P<0.01).
Contrarily to acute CFR, CFR at follow-up is an independent predictor of EC after reperfused anterior MI. This suggests that the improvement of the coronary microcirculation is closely linked to the physical aptitude after MI.
急性心肌梗死(MI)后,冠状动脉微血管功能障碍和运动能力下降均是预后的决定因素。
我们测试了心肌梗死后进行的无创冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)是否能预测心肌梗死后的运动能力(EC)。
连续入选50例首次再灌注的ST段抬高型前壁心肌梗死患者(平均年龄56.5±11岁,30%为女性),机械再灌注后TIMI血流3级持续存在,在成功进行直接冠状动脉血管成形术后24小时内(CFR 1),以及经过一段时间的康复和心脏康复计划后4±1.6个月(CFR 2),前瞻性地对左前降支(LAD)远端进行无创CFR检测,采用静脉输注腺苷(0.14mg/kg每分钟,2分钟内)。CFR定义为充血期LAD峰值血流速度除以基线血流速度。所有患者在CFR 2当天还接受了半卧位运动负荷超声心动图(ESE)检查。ESE初始负荷为25 - 30瓦,每隔2分钟增加20瓦。在ESE前24小时停用β受体阻滞剂。
与CFR 1相比,CFR 2平均值显著升高(2.9±0.65对1.9±0.4,P<0.01)。在ESE期间,达到的最大预测心率百分比为82±12%,最大负荷95±30瓦,运动持续时间486±155秒,双乘积比值3.1±0.8,运动能力5.8±1.1代谢当量。所有患者在ESE期间均未诱发缺血,静息和运动时二尖瓣反流程度无显著差异。CFR 2与所有与运动能力相关的指标均显著相关(均P<0.01),而CFR 1与随访时的左心室收缩功能相关(P<0.05),但与运动能力无关。在包括年龄、性别和体重指数的多因素分析中,CFR 2仍然是运动能力的独立预测因素(P<0.01)。
与急性CFR相反,随访时的CFR是再灌注前壁心肌梗死后运动能力的独立预测因素。这表明冠状动脉微循环的改善与心肌梗死后的体能密切相关。