National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD, U.S.A.
Stat Med. 2013 Feb 28;32(5):884-97. doi: 10.1002/sim.5580. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
The debate over whether certain antihypertensive medications have benefits beyond what would be expected from their blood pressure lowering spurred the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial, which randomized 42,418 participants to chlorthalidone (15,255), amlodipine (9048), lisinopril (9054), or doxazosin (9061). We compared chlorthalidone, the active control, with each of the other three agents with respect to the primary outcome, fatal coronary heart disease or nonfatal myocardial infarction, and several other clinical endpoints. The arms were similar with respect to the primary endpoint, although some differences were found for other endpoints, most notably heart failure. Although the desire was to achieve similar blood pressure reductions in the four arms, we found some systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure differences. A natural question is to what degree can observed treatment group differences in cardiovascular outcomes be attributed to these blood pressure differences. The purpose of this paper was to delineate the problems inherent in attempting to answer this question, and to present analyses intended to overcome these problems.
关于某些降压药物是否除了降低血压之外还有益处的争论,促使进行了降压和降脂治疗以预防心脏病发作试验,该试验将 42418 名参与者随机分为氯噻酮(15255 人)、氨氯地平(9048 人)、赖诺普利(9054 人)或多沙唑嗪(9061 人)。我们比较了活性对照氯噻酮与其他三种药物的主要结局,即致命性冠心病或非致命性心肌梗死,以及其他几个临床终点。各治疗组在主要终点方面相似,尽管在其他终点方面发现了一些差异,尤其是心力衰竭。尽管我们希望在四个治疗组中实现类似的血压降低,但我们发现了一些收缩压和舒张压差异。一个自然的问题是,心血管结局中观察到的治疗组差异在多大程度上可以归因于这些血压差异。本文的目的是阐明试图回答这个问题所固有的问题,并提出旨在克服这些问题的分析。