Davies Jennifer M, Bailey Marc A, Griffin Kathryn J, Scott D Julian A
The Division of Cardiovascular & Diabetes Research, The Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health & Therapeutics, The University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT.
Vascular. 2012 Dec;20(6):342-9. doi: 10.1258/vasc.2011.ra0054. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is a known indicator of arterial stiffness and cardiovascular risk. We critically evaluated the evidence supporting the four main non-invasive devices available to assess it: Complior, SphygmoCor, Arteriograph and Vicorder. PubMed and Medline databases (1960-2011) were searched to identify studies reporting carotid-femoral PWV in humans using one or more of the four devices. Of the 183 articles retrieved, 43 met inclusion criteria. The Arteriograph device demonstrated least variance but had poor agreement with the other devices. Undisputable reference values for PWV need to be established and internationally agreed, and a standardized method for superficial distance measurement generated to reduce variability. Further studies comparing all four devices with invasive assessment are necessary.
脉搏波速度(PWV)是动脉僵硬度和心血管风险的一个已知指标。我们严格评估了支持用于评估该指标的四种主要非侵入性设备的证据:Complior、SphygmoCor、动脉造影仪和Vicorder。检索了PubMed和Medline数据库(1960年至2011年),以识别使用这四种设备中的一种或多种报告人体颈动脉-股动脉PWV的研究。在检索到的183篇文章中,43篇符合纳入标准。动脉造影仪设备显示出最小的变异性,但与其他设备的一致性较差。需要建立无可争议的PWV参考值并在国际上达成共识,并生成一种标准化的表面距离测量方法以减少变异性。有必要进行进一步的研究,将所有这四种设备与侵入性评估进行比较。