Sanhudo Jose Veiga, Gomes Joao Ellera, Rabello Marcelo Costa, Delucca Giuseppe
UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Foot Ankle Spec. 2012 Dec;5(6):374-7. doi: 10.1177/1938640012457939. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
The intermetatarsal angle (IMA), the hallux valgus angle (HVA), and the lateral sesamoid malalignment in relation to the first metatarsal are among the most commonly employed parameters to estimate the severity of the deformity. The aim of this study was to compare HV angular measurements and a linear measurement among 4 observers to determine its intraobserver and interobserver reliability, to find out whether this linear measurement technique is more reproducible than those already-described angular measurements.
The IMA, the HVA, and the distance between the lateral cortex of the first metatarsal and the lateral cortex of the lateral sesamoid bone were measured from 50 standing, nonoperated hallux valgus feet. Radiographs were shuffled and reforwarded to the observers at a minimum interval of 30 days for a new measurement.
When considering 2° of difference as significant, IMA and HVA measurements were not precise, showing low reproducibility for both intraobserver and interobserver assessment. Regarding the distance between the first metatarsal lateral cortex and the lateral sesamoid lateral cortex, when considering differences greater than 2 mm as significant, we observed higher precision and higher reproducibility.
Angular measurements of hallux valgus deformity in anteroposterior standing radiographs that are manually performed with a goniometer are not precise and have low reproducibility. The linear measurement of the distance between the lateral cortices of the first metatarsal head and the lateral sesamoid demonstrated higher precision and higher reproducibility, and may be a cheap form to assess the correct indication of a distal osteotomy.
Diagnostic, Level II.
跖间角(IMA)、拇外翻角(HVA)以及外侧籽骨相对于第一跖骨的排列不齐是评估畸形严重程度最常用的参数。本研究的目的是比较4名观察者之间的HVA角度测量和一项线性测量,以确定其观察者内和观察者间的可靠性,探究这项线性测量技术是否比已描述的角度测量技术更具可重复性。
从50例站立位、未经手术治疗的拇外翻足测量IMA、HVA以及第一跖骨外侧皮质与外侧籽骨外侧皮质之间的距离。将X线片打乱,以至少30天的间隔重新发给观察者进行新的测量。
当将2°的差异视为有意义时,IMA和HVA测量不精确,在观察者内和观察者间评估中均显示出低可重复性。关于第一跖骨外侧皮质与外侧籽骨外侧皮质之间的距离,当将大于2mm的差异视为有意义时,我们观察到更高的精度和更高的可重复性。
使用测角器手动进行的前后位站立X线片中拇外翻畸形的角度测量不精确且可重复性低。第一跖骨头外侧皮质与外侧籽骨之间距离的线性测量显示出更高的精度和更高的可重复性,并且可能是评估远端截骨正确指征的一种廉价方式。
诊断性,二级。